Bluemanc100 said:Bigga said:Lucky13 said:An extra 8bn being pumped into it, four times what the socialists pledged.
In politics a 'pledge' is not a promise. As I said a few weeks ago, if the Cons are going to put in £8 billion, they haven't said at what point that will start to happen and from where they will get that money.
The Cons have less than a 1% swing against Labour, that's about 17 seats, so they didn't do that great against their main rivals. People rejected the Libs and, obviously, the SNP came into play to work against Labour.
What that means is Labour are alive and kicking. A new radiant leader will give them all they need in England, without reliance on Scottish influence.
Really? The Jocks decided the majority of what happened last night and the public have spoken
People are saying that you cant blame Ed, I disagree, its akin to Tommy Cooper passing me his material, I'd die flat on my arse! It's about policies and pledges for sure but the key is the delivery and having credibility
They fucked up big time as we all know when they let David move to the Big Apple and this is not an overnight fix
A gamble that looks to have failed miserably
Ed Milligan was no where near on track to become Labour leader until the real puppet masters decided he was the most malleable tool.
Labour did not 'let' David M go - their bosses chose. It was a simple question of ".......he who pays the piper......."
The control of Labour by the Unions has not been commented upon much in this election - but it is likely the reason that Labour will never come back.
The days that such extreme left-wing doctrine and Union manipulation can be dressed up to be attractive to an increasingly independent and free-thinking public are gone forever.