Bigga
Well-Known Member
I've only just watched this interview as I wanted avoid the hoopla and royalist bullshit that often occurs on threads like this.
I wonder if anyone pro-monarchy realises the trend of The Firm/ Institution that has affected many of the females of the Royal family? Lots have been excommunicated, in some way, and some have turned to drink or faded into the background. If not the family, directly, the surrounding firm around them is, clearly, toxic for anyone who wants to be 'different'.
For what it's worth I believe most of what they have to say (Megan, in particular, about the 'crying' incident, I think they both had a tiff and both cried) and I've always thought it odd that Archie was not afforded a title.
I thought it was the monarchy, itself, that decided these things, but I believe the Institution had changed the rules.
Pretty striking and blatant in its racial slant to change the norm in proceedings.
Harry seems to use "they" when referring to the Firm and there's a clear disdain for them.
I wonder if anyone pro-monarchy realises the trend of The Firm/ Institution that has affected many of the females of the Royal family? Lots have been excommunicated, in some way, and some have turned to drink or faded into the background. If not the family, directly, the surrounding firm around them is, clearly, toxic for anyone who wants to be 'different'.
For what it's worth I believe most of what they have to say (Megan, in particular, about the 'crying' incident, I think they both had a tiff and both cried) and I've always thought it odd that Archie was not afforded a title.
I thought it was the monarchy, itself, that decided these things, but I believe the Institution had changed the rules.
Pretty striking and blatant in its racial slant to change the norm in proceedings.
Harry seems to use "they" when referring to the Firm and there's a clear disdain for them.