Bigga
Well-Known Member
And changed by the queen for charlotte
Now THAT is super interesting and dismisses anybody's argument about Harry and Meghan's overall point.
And changed by the queen for charlotte
Not really when you understand the change that Cameron introduced.Now THAT is super interesting and dismisses anybody's argument about Harry and Meghan's overall point.
Anne declined any royal titles for her children.
As for the interview, I saw snippets but it was obviously completely one sided and I think it's better to always get the other side to get balance.
This is where H and M were safe, as the family were never going to get into a public slanging match.
Do we (UK) even have the right to put that sort of protection in place on US soil long term? It's also a fairly hefty ask on the UK taxpayer to mount a permanent operation of that scale abroad - it's not just the armed 'heavies' you may see, but the support staff and infrastructure behind it, along with sufficient numbers for rotation/holidays/sickness etc.
Andrews kids are princesses and they are not working royals , it is a confusing system, taking security from them was a spiteful and dangerous move
Do we (UK) even have the right to put that sort of protection in place on US soil long term? It's also a fairly hefty ask on the UK taxpayer to mount a permanent operation of that scale abroad - it's not just the armed 'heavies' you may see, but the support staff and infrastructure behind it, along with sufficient numbers for rotation/holidays/sickness etc.
Not really when you understand the change that Cameron introduced.
Absolutely - but that's families for you etc.You have a point, but being outcast and given no help forced Harry's hand. Which is basically what he said.
Absolutely - but that's families for you etc.
They all piss and shit and their farts stink too mate - sorry to burst your bubble. Seeing as their hereditary rights and position are based upon knocking some other bloke off a horse and chopping his head of in distant times past I'm not sure the 60p a year we each pay in tax to keep them entitles us to expect more from them in terms of inter-family personal relations. Every family has fall-outs, bust ups, and outcasts with toxicity balanced out by love if we're lucky. The only difference with the royals is they get spied on by the tabloids and wash their dirty laundry in front of a global audience and Oprah, rather than with their mates on facebook and down the pub....??
So, in the interview, Winfrey underlines that there are celebrities and then there's the royal family which is on a whole different scale.
This is not 'just a family', like any other.