Bigga
Well-Known Member
if you believe she never googled the royal family or harry then your gullible to say the least
Hmm.
Another who didn't actually listen to what was said.
if you believe she never googled the royal family or harry then your gullible to say the least
The rules that denied Archie a title of Prince were set in 1907...
Neither Prince Andrew nor Princess Anne’s children get any protection either.
Non working royals don’t receive state protection. Like princess Ann’s children. I did a Google search on Bing and it’s a Scotland Yard decision.
And changed by the queen for charlotteThe rules that denied Archie a title of Prince were set in 1907...
Anne declined any royal titles for her children.Do they have royal titles?
If so, they get protection, even if it's at a very low level.
Andrews kids are princesses and they are not working royals , it is a confusing system, taking security from them was a spiteful and dangerous moveDo they have royal titles?
If so, they get protection, even if it's at a very low level.
Do we (UK) even have the right to put that sort of protection in place on US soil long term? It's also a fairly hefty ask on the UK taxpayer to mount a permanent operation of that scale abroad - it's not just the armed 'heavies' you may see, but the support staff and infrastructure behind it, along with sufficient numbers for rotation/holidays/sickness etc.Andrews kids are princesses and they are not working royals , it is a confusing system, taking security from them was a spiteful and dangerous move
Do they have royal titles?
If so, they get protection, even if it's at a very low level.