The Harry and Meghan fuss

[Bigga]

if you believe she never googled the royal family or harry then your gullible to say the least

Hmm.

Another who didn't actually listen to what was said.

 

[Bigga]

The rules that denied Archie a title of Prince were set in 1907...

Indeed.

My point was how did Harry not indicate clear knowledge of this fact?

 

[Bigga]

Neither Prince Andrew nor Princess Anne’s children get any protection either.

Do they have royal titles?

If so, they get protection, even if it's at a very low level.

 

[Mr Kobayashi]

Non working royals don’t receive state protection. Like princess Ann’s children. I did a Google search on Bing and it’s a Scotland Yard decision.

It’s "Anne's". No one will take you seriously if you can't even get your spelling right

 

[kaz7]

The rules that denied Archie a title of Prince were set in 1907...

And changed by the queen for charlotte

 

[mackenzie]

Do they have royal titles?

If so, they get protection, even if it's at a very low level.

Anne declined any royal titles for her children.
As for the interview, I saw snippets but it was obviously completely one sided and I think it's better to always get the other side to get balance.
This is where H and M were safe, as the family were never going to get into a public slanging match.

 

[lefty goldblatt]

I think "Wrighty" was hoping it was going to be Arsenal.

 

[kaz7]

Do they have royal titles?

If so, they get protection, even if it's at a very low level.

Andrews kids are princesses and they are not working royals , it is a confusing system, taking security from them was a spiteful and dangerous move

 

[Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese]

Andrews kids are princesses and they are not working royals , it is a confusing system, taking security from them was a spiteful and dangerous move

Do we (UK) even have the right to put that sort of protection in place on US soil long term? It's also a fairly hefty ask on the UK taxpayer to mount a permanent operation of that scale abroad - it's not just the armed 'heavies' you may see, but the support staff and infrastructure behind it, along with sufficient numbers for rotation/holidays/sickness etc.

 

[Mr Kobayashi]

Do they have royal titles?

If so, they get protection, even if it's at a very low level.

They used to, they don't anymore.

The rules were relaxed under the Cameron coalition government as the future Cambidge children (Louis and Charlotte) wouldn't have been automatically entitled to become Prince and Princesses but first born George would have been.

The question is whether Harry and Meghan were under the impression that the rules were to be relaxed again- and why they were under that impression. Is it the case they have erroneously jumped to that conclusion, or were they actively [by false representation] or passively misled i. e. by an ommision of communicating the true facts and circumstances and the knock-on effect of Charlie's desire for a smaller monarchy to them.