The Harry and Meghan fuss

[Alan Harper's Tash]

I'm trying to break him in the hope of forcing a hardware upgrade. There is currently steam coming out of the side.

Just for today maybe someone needs to pop down and turn him on and off again?

Could try a defrag, but he may be an earlier model. You may need to refresh autoexec.bat commands.

 

[Octavian]

You’ve mentioned skin colour in most of your posts.

You're worse than Meghan. ;-)

I’ve mentioned it by quoting her…

 

[Mr Kobayashi]

The conversation took place when Meghan was pregnant and she admits to knowing about the George V convention on why Archie won’t be a Prince when he’s born.

“Disingenuous” is those pretending otherwise.

Was there a means of changing that?

Another letters patent perhaps?

Daughter of William and Kate will be a princess

www.independent.co.uk

 

[Octavian]

I'm trying to break him in the hope of forcing a hardware upgrade. There is currently steam coming out of the side.

Just for today maybe someone needs to pop down and turn him on and off again?

Haha I’ve calmly responded with facts to probably the biggest idiot on the website and you think I need turning off and on again?

I preferred you as Fode in the Hole mate :-)

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

I’ve mentioned it by quoting her…

Indeed. That makes you part of the problem, doesn’t it?

I‘m quite enjoying channelling my inner Daily Mail reporter.

 

[Octavian]

Was there a means of changing that?

Another letters patent perhaps?

Daughter of William and Kate will be a princess

www.independent.co.uk

If you read past the first paragraph you will see that it was reversing sexism to female Royals.

William’s daughter wasn’t given the title of HRH due to her being female, but his son was.

Harry’s children weren’t given the title due to George V slimming down the Royal Family.

I think we can all agree the merit in doing both actions is completely different?

 

[Octavian]

Indeed. That makes you part of the problem, doesn’t it?

I‘m quite enjoying channelling my inner Daily Mail reporter.

It’s more like the Morning Star round here.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

It’s more like the Morning Star round here.

It’s nothing like it, mate.

Suggesting Meghan isn’t a racist does not make one a communist, unless you are Donald Trump.

 

[M18CTID]

Oprah asked two main questions about Archie’s titles and in both answers she mentions is skin colour, in the 2nd she mentions concerns from a Royal about skin colour in answer to a question about titles.

@oldius believes she is letting people know it was because of racism and he thinks she’s right.

You disagree tho?

So you admit that these are 2 separate incidents?

I've no idea what Meghan believes is the reason for Archie not getting a title because she never said why in the interview.

Regarding the question about Archie's skin colour, I believe Harry when he says that question was asked. I also think it's pertinent that the Palace have never denied that incident took place.

 

[Octavian]

So you admit that these are 2 separate incidents?

I've no idea what Meghan believes is the reason for Archie not getting a title because she never said why in the interview.

Regarding the question about Archie's skin colour, I believe Harry when he says that question was asked. I also think it's pertinent that the Palace have never denied that incident took place.

Meghan said the conversations around skin colour happened in tandem with conversations around titles.

I think if the skin colour conversation did happen then it was a separate incident and didn’t affect Archie’s title, that’s my point!

Harry said it wasn’t a member of his immediate family and hasn’t named the person.

It was obviously a minor royal in that case and wouldn’t affect Archie’s titles.

So Meghan bringing that conversation is disingenuous as to why Archie wasn’t a Prince.

There we go, we got there.