The Harry and Meghan fuss

[Alan Harper's Tash]

It’s not the same is it.

Guess people refuse to admit when they’re wrong.

It’s a weird part of the website this politics forum.

Very scouse like.

No, we’ve had 5-10 pages of debate on whether there was an Oxford comma present when Meghan was talking or not.

You say there’s no way, whereas we are suggesting it is quite plausible to have one there.

The burden of proof is on you to prove there wasn’t, rather than us disproving your theory.

 

[oldius]

I don’t necessarily disagree but I don’t care that much until it’s proven they’ve abused it.

Did you read the article about it? Here's another with recruitment details: I look forward to your unqualified condemnation.

Buckingham Palace’s lack of ethnic minorities has long been obvious – even to devotees | Phillip Hall

Recent revelations cast a light on a long and unedifying history, says Phillip Hall, author of Royal Fortune: Tax, Money and the Monarchy

www.theguardian.com

40% minority population in London, now 8.5% of palace employees.

Buckingham Palace reveals 8.5% ethnic minority staff

Royal accounts show 8.5% of household staff are of ethnic minority - its target for 2022 is 10%.

www.bbc.co.uk

 

[Phil1]

Bill Murray is just about to do a news report on a famous festival if you look outside your windows. Think Andie Macdowell might be there as well..

 

[Eccles Blue]

Ee by gum. I love BlueMoon, my children and grandchildren.

I love my children, grandchildren and BlueMoon.

;-) :-)

 

[Octavian]

No, we’ve had 5-10 pages of debate on whether there was an Oxford comma present when Meghan was talking or not.

You say there’s no way, whereas we are suggesting it is quite plausible to have one there.

The burden of proof is on you to prove there wasn’t, rather than us disproving your theory.

Guardian agrees with me and they’re one of the papers who has defended Meghan.


Just saying

 

[Mr Kobayashi]

No, we’ve had 5-10 pages of debate on whether there was an Oxford comma present when Meghan was talking or not.

You say there’s no way, whereas we are suggesting it is quite plausible to have one there.

The burden of proof is on you to prove there wasn’t, rather than us disproving your theory.

A bishop, a rabbi, a cleric and a roman emperor walk into the pub.

Barman looks at them and says...

you three did that joke last week, don't think that you'll get more laughs just by letting a fat bloke in a smiffys outfit tag along.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Guardian agrees with me and they’re one of the papers who has defended Meghan.


Just saying


View attachment 55908

Is that supposed to add weight to your argument?

They do know how to use an Oxford comma in syntax though, just not in speech. ;-)

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

A bishop, a rabbi, a cleric and a roman emperor walk into the pub.

Barman looks at them and says...

you three did that joke last week, don't think that you'll get more laughs just by letting a fat bloke in a smiffys outfit tag along.

It’s ok, he’d left his bike outside.

 

[Octavian]

Is that supposed to add weight to your argument?

They do know how to use an Oxford comma in syntax though, just not in speech. ;-)

The Sun put the comma in there!

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

The Sun put the comma in there!

So, you’re suggesting theyndo understand the Oxford comma it’s just that it needed to be ignored for their narrative to work? ;-)