Lucky13
Well-Known Member
BigTony said:Murph said:BigTony said:What could they have done differently?
Did you think they should have sat back and done nothing?
Also the British Army have killed a lot more innocent people.
Why did the IRA need to attack soft targets? Why the need to kill and maim innocent civilians going about their everyday business? It was Callous and indiscriminate! A bomb doesn't differentiate between Black or White or Catholic or Protestant.
The IRA could have taken the fight solely to the Army, but they chose not to, maybe because unarmed civilians can't shoot back?
If they'd took it straight to the army and wern't anonymous they would have just got arrested.
Remember they see it as their country and the Army as invaders/oppresors.
Again though the British army killed a lot more innocent civilians, the more you go back the worse it is. I don't think we're taught the truth in England, I know I wasn't in school, or haven't been by the media.
I do think they went too far at the end though and the guy showing the warringto picture, I could show pictures of 100s of innocent people killed by the british army, are they not as important in your eyes?
If it was a war , have the courage to fight the opposition , shoot at people who can shoot back , cowards blow up children , cowards blow up the Household Cavalry on parade , cowards blow up Rememberance Services and cowards blow up town centres , but thats something you admire , says a lot about you.