People standing around watching aren’t the ones being arrested, charged and incarcerated.Come off it Fumble, you're one of the more intelligent people on here. It's ludicrous to suggest that every person standing around watching was necessarily far right and necessarily a rioter. That's plainly a silly suggestion - you're above such nonsense.
It’s all relative.Come off it Fumble, you're one of the more intelligent people on here.
I agree with you that in the main, bystanders have not been arrested. In the main. (The judge who said anyone standing around and watching can expect to be arrested and prosecuted, was certainly not helping!)People standing around watching aren’t the ones being arrested, charged and incarcerated.
The ones chucking bricks, setting fire to things and inciting others are the ones being prosecuted.
If you can find anyone who got arrested just for standing there post the link. The best you’ve done so far is suggest someone got locked up for shouting at a dog but conveniently missing out his incitement of others to commit violent crime.
Have you forgotten how the riots started?Come off it Fumble, you're one of the more intelligent people on here. It's ludicrous to suggest that every person standing around watching was necessarily far right and necessarily a rioter. That's plainly a silly suggestion - you're above such nonsense.
No, it's opinion based shiteIs that even a real news channel?
Really? Are you REALLY that up his arse? Here he is IN MAY saying there's a £46bn black hole, and then once elected, he doesn't know about any black hole and a £22bn black hole has come as a huge shock.
If you can, could you try to explain and justify or even attempt to explain this without looking silly? Go on, give your best shot. I could do with a laugh.
(We can gloss over him clearly criticizing any plans to end the WFA.)
Or you could answer the question: How do you justify Starmer claiming he knew nothing about the black hole, when he is on video, talking about the black hole in Parliament in May of this year?Please seek help.
So you're being radicalised. You could have just switched him off or stuck to the bit about watches. Where's the proof on Sharia law? This is worth a listen:Interesting, I will watch it. Thanks.
Actually though, I am somewhat of a neurtal bystander in this, not a nativist at all. I am fortunate to live in a leafy suburb where there is total social cohesion because everyone is middle class white British. You don't see a non-white face around here, so this whole question was until a few weeks ago, something I never gave a moments thought to. To be clear, I am not saying White British is a solution, merely reflecting that IS the demographic where I live, so no-one ever gives multi-racial social cohesion a passing thought.
Anyway, there's a guy on Youtube - Paul Walsh - who is/was a watch dealer and as I am interested in watches, so I used to watch his channel. But over recent months he's been getting seemingly more and more "racist", which I was finding a big turn off. I even contemplated emailing him to say he needs to give his head a wobble because the problems he kept banging on about do not exist.
But gradually, I have started to realise he has a point. I have come to realise that there are large parts of the country where all is not harmonious. In particular, there are large numbers of Islamists who would if they could, introduce Sharia law. There is clearly a problem is some parts of the country, and not talking about it, is not the solution.