Bournemouth Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Mar 2015
- Messages
- 3,232
Any party with a landslide at an election seems to think they can do what they want. They can, but it will have consequences down the line. That is all I am saying.
Very good !Didn’t have you down as a Labour voter.
Never thought I’d see the death of the Tory party in my lifetime but to see the Labour Party trying to take its place is disappointing to say the least.This wouldn’t be defended on here if it was a Tory government discussing this policy so I don’t see why anyone would defend Labour doing it.
This wouldn’t be defended on here if it was a Tory government discussing this policy so I don’t see why anyone would defend Labour doing it.
I’d suggest most won’t defend it, right or left. Personally I’d like to see the detail rather than the spin.Most won't defend it, they'll ignore it. Pretty much complete silence on it.
you 're right it will. The whole system is broken at present and where to start is key but there has to be buy in from the population. As an example: a couple live opposite my mother-in-law and own their house. They have now acquired another house which a close family member lives in, doesn't work and gets the rent paid by the council. Public funds are effectively paying the mortgage and so the couple will eventually own 2 houses, one of which the daughter has been living in and getting her rent paid. And they are not the only ones. Now, to me, that is where they should be starting reform as this will almost certainly gain acceptance as the first step to reform.Any party with a landslide at an election seems to think they can do what they want. They can, but it will have consequences down the line. That is all I am saying.
you 're right it will. The whole system is broken at present and where to start is key but there has to be buy in from the population. As an example: a couple live opposite my mother-in-law and own their house. They have now acquired another house which a close family member lives in, doesn't work and gets the rent paid by the council. Public funds are effectively paying the mortgage and so the couple will eventually own 2 houses, one of which the daughter has been living in and getting her rent paid. And they are not the only ones. Now, to me, that is where they should be starting reform as this will almost certainly gain acceptance as the first step to reform.
First thing that needs reforming is Parliament and what MP’s are allowed either to do or vote on.you 're right it will. The whole system is broken at present and where to start is key but there has to be buy in from the population. As an example: a couple live opposite my mother-in-law and own their house. They have now acquired another house which a close family member lives in, doesn't work and gets the rent paid by the council. Public funds are effectively paying the mortgage and so the couple will eventually own 2 houses, one of which the daughter has been living in and getting her rent paid. And they are not the only ones. Now, to me, that is where they should be starting reform as this will almost certainly gain acceptance as the first step to reform.
That's the only reason why they are doing it, austerity and taking money off the old and disabled is suddenly necessary.This wouldn’t be defended on here if it was a Tory government discussing this policy so I don’t see why anyone would defend Labour doing it.
First thing that needs reforming is Parliament and what MP’s are allowed either to do or vote on.
When 13% of MP’s are landlords and they own 184 properties between them, there’s more chance of Southampton winning this seasons PL than there is any reform of the housing market. The last government couldn’t even get a bill through parliament that said rental homes had to be ‘fit for human occupation’, as they had 83 landlords, with this government being just as bad, so there’s no chance of them looking at rent reform, sadly.
The real reason. It is a terrible time to do buy-to-let at today's house prices.
First thing that needs reforming is Parliament and what MP’s are allowed either to do or vote on.
When 13% of MP’s are landlords and they own 184 properties between them, there’s more chance of Southampton winning this seasons PL than there is any reform of the housing market. The last government couldn’t even get a bill through parliament that said rental homes had to be ‘fit for human occupation’, as they had 83 landlords, with this government being just as bad, so there’s no chance of them looking at rent reform, sadly.
Following the lead of the democratic party in the USA. Tax jobs, punish the elderly and severely disabled to fit into self-imposed budgetary restrictions.Never thought I’d see the death of the Tory party in my lifetime but to see the Labour Party trying to take its place is disappointing to say the least.
This wouldn’t be defended on here if it was a Tory government discussing this policy so I don’t see why anyone would defend Labour doing it.
so Starmer thinks we need austerity 2.0, punish those who can't fight back and leave no clear water between him and the Tories....the Dem's did that in America and paved the way for Trump.
Farage must be licking his lips..
![]()
Starmer decries ‘worst of all worlds’ benefits system ahead of deep cuts
PM expected to announce billions in savings from personal independence payment, the main disability benefitwww.theguardian.com
Thats only an issue if you are your typical, get a few houses and use as a future pension type investor. Wealthy people dont pay these interest rates. They borrow against assets at much lower rates.The real reason. It is a terrible time to do buy-to-let at today's house prices.
![]()