Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 18,194
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Ha ha ha!
Presumably Sunak's response ! ( said in a caring tone obviously )
obviously
Ha ha ha!
So they got exactly what they asked for or they didn’t. Which was it?They knew 35% was totally unrealistic. Read Brewster Millions posts.
I didn’t agree with the clapping nonsense either, as I thought it was patronising.
However the 35% pay rise demand was unjustified in my opinion, not least because it was calculated using RPI. RPI is a flawed measure of inflation and typically overstates price growth by around 0.75 to 1%-pt each year - a key distorting factor when looking over a period of ten, fifteen years - and so using this measure wasn’t a realistic choice for negotiation.
They should bring in legislation where restaurants can’t put service charge on stating it’s optional, the option should be you give it nit ask for it to be taken off. They’ve slowly started increasing it as well think it’s around 12.5%, I’m out Saturday I’m asking for mine not to be added as I give 10% and in cash, people are getting fucking greedy now, it’s expensive enough to eat and drink and I don’t mind paying for food service but 10% is plenty, £15 on my bill is plenty enough in my opinion.
Ye in my local I always use card so hardly tip, but if we win the quiz or the play your cards right we slip them a tenner. If I go for a meal there I always make it up on the card.I went to New York for 5 days, found a good boozer off 5th Ave to spend the evening relaxing(ie getting pissed) after walking all day
Think I sent that barman's kids through college with tips.
I'm like you 10% cash in restaurants. If they're moody fuckers 5%.
Card payments must be killing bar staff though.
How did the government manage to agree a deal with the consultants, if there was a lack of engagement?Probably because they were so pissed off with the Tories lack of engagement, they wanted to ensure a wipe out at the election.
The Government had numerous opportunities to negotiate with them but flatly refused, why was that?
Because we’re discussing the Junior Drs, not the consultants. Labour have within two weeks negotiated and agreed a pay deal which was nowhere near what they were demanding.How did the government manage to agree a deal with the consultants, if there was a lack of engagement?
Perhaps because the consultants didn’t construct a spurious pay demand designed to obstruct proper negotiation.
Well, that's sorted then...