The Labour Government

[maxwellblue]

I think what you mean Karen is that you want to hear nice things about Labour. There's plenty of discussion about Labour but shall we say not all positive.

As for me reeling them in, I have no desire to talk about the Tories. In fact quite the opposite.

btw I note you spent 19 pages slagging of the Tories in the Conservative Party thread.

She'll deny it and call you a wum, then a c***

 

[blueinsa]

She'll deny it and call you a wum, then a c***

And then hit the report button normally ;-)

 

[Mr Kobayashi]

She'll deny it and call you a wum, then a c***

Is it a crime to tell the truth?

 

[homerdog]

View attachment 132191

I note that Chris Mason, who has broken this story, is paid circa £260,000 by the BBC as its Political Editor. Might help put this story into perspective.

 

[bluethrunthru]

still not enough ££££ but plans originally under a Tory Govt was a £41m spend ............ funny how when you threaten punitive sanctions they suddenly find the cash

Windermere sewage: Water firm pledges more cash

Campaigners describe United Utilities latest promise of funding as the "bare minimum".

www.bbc.co.uk

 

[meltonblue]

View attachment 132191

That really shouldn’t be a story, aside from whether the PM is paid as much as they should.

 

[Postman Pep]

High quality candidate update. The slum landlord they shitefested over the line at the expense of Tarry strikes again.

 

[ganganvince]

 

[Brewster's millions]

View attachment 132234

Anyone earning a similar salary to Starmer, but who wasn’t an MP and had to pay for all of that out of their own pocket, would have to earn an extra 50k a year to do so.

Puts it into perspective. Shameless.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

This thread has more cryptofascists than my local!

 

[TinFoilHat]

View attachment 132191

 

[Big Joe Corrigan]

View attachment 132197

Their not there.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

btw I note you spent 19 pages slagging of the Tories in the Conservative Party thread.

I spent more than 19 pages calling Sunak a rat-faced ****.

 

[Ifwecouldjust.......]

The energy market in the UK is a joke. The consumers are being gouged year after year. Energy companies make huge profits but there is virtually no investmet, that that does go ahead is heavily subsidised / underwritten by the tax payer. Yet no-one is calling out the Energy companies for letting pensioners die of cold.

If energy costs were reasonable the WFA wouldn't be needed by so many. In Q4 in the UK the predicted price for electricity is 22p kWh in Stockholm (mid-price region in Sweden) it is just over 3p kWh. So it will cosy me about £27 to buy the £200 worth of 'leccy the WFA would buy.

The solution that seems to work is progressive energy pricing, where each household gets an allowace at a low price to cover basics and then the cost per kWh increases i stages as use increases. So heating your bedroom is cheap but heating your outdoor pool costs an arm and a leg.

If only we had a gas and Electricity business which produced , stored and distributed power that was owned by the public and run on a not for profit basis for the benefit of the population .

oh wait we did ...........


Virtually every problem this country faces is as a direct result of Conservative policies and decisions.

 

[melrose40yarder]

Labour have committed to bringing Railways back into public ownership ... no need to die on this hill now.

Sooner we have driverless trains the better.

 

[PPT]

Anyone earning a similar salary to Starmer, but who wasn’t an MP and had to pay for all of that out of their own pocket, would have to earn an extra 50k a year to do so.

Puts it into perspective. Shameless.

Starmer the king of Sleaze.

 

[hilts]

I spent more than 19 pages calling Sunak a rat-faced ****.

True but you don't continually try and shut down the views of people discussing Labour or Starmer in the their respective threads.

 

[Chippy_boy]

I spent more than 19 pages calling Sunak a rat-faced ****.

I thought he was a characterless, dry and ineffectual pratt. But that's one line. I struggle to imagine how you could drag that out over multiple posts. He was not interesting enough to be that bad, surely?

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

True but you don't continually try and shut down the views of people discussing Labour or Starmer in the their respective threads.

It’s one of the many advantages of being a centrist :-)

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

I thought he was a characterless, dry and ineffectual pratt. But that's one line. I struggle to imagine how you could drag that out over multiple posts. He was not interesting enough to be that bad, surely?

He was both rat-faced and a ****. Agree he wasn’t very interesting. But Starmer isn’t either.

I think a night down the pub with those two boring cunts would be interminable.