It shouldn’t happen to people who haven’t had their applications considered as was the case with the Rwanda farce but presumably for a fraction of the cost they’ve actually managed to process some of the backlog that the previous government didn’t bother doing and deported those that have failed in their application. Why are you so against that? I would imagine that if we’re looking for a deterrent to stop non-genuine asylum seekers coming, the prospect of being dealt with quickly and flown to their country of origin would be greater than offering them thousands to go to Rwanda after sitting in a UK hotel for years.