The Light Was Yellow Sir
Well-Known Member
You’d have an entirely reasonable point if it was just that private schools had better teachers/teaching/discipline or anything else that helps children fulfil their potential, surely the aim of schooling, and we lived in a world that success was based on merit.Nothing wrong with the notion of giving the teachers a bonus etc but I really can’t get my head around the logic of removing VAT breaks on private education.
Labour plan to give teachers £2,400 to stop them quitting
The party would also make it compulsory for new joiners to have a formal teaching qualification.www.bbc.co.uk
An entirely non-aspirational policy - the proverbial socialist school race where one kid has a broken leg so we break everyone’s leg to make it “fair”. The argument is it gives kids a head start - so why don’t we aspire to make it easier to get in to (pay for it ahead of income tax to make it more accessible) or aspire to make state schools better if it’s such a benefit? Most parents who sent their kids to private school go without holidays etc to make it happen, just about afford it now - the ones who won’t care will just be able to pay up the next x years of education and beat the tax hike anyway.
I’m excited to see how they differentiate between private school fees and uni school fees. Both paid for education by the individual. Got court cases written all over this if they try and drawer a distinction between the two.
Trouble is, in this country, just going to these schools gives you a massive head start. Not based on achievements, exam success or technical ability, just the mere fact you’ve attended one of those schools and the cycle never stops.
Finally, you surely can’t be a charity if you’re charging £32000 for a day school and over £52000 for a boarding school place, every year?