Agreed, but the statistical probability that it is exactly 50/50 is minuscule, without having to factor in the other variables.
that can't be right, can it?Yes you’re correct. It has to be wrong because the global fertility rate is 2.3.
If half the babies didn’t make it past day one then we’d be well below replacement rate and the population of the earth would be decreasing… which it demonstrably is not even close to doing.
Ok, I’m out.
I’m also out.
I replied to a poster that posts well on many subjects.and yet you both continued replying on the subject.
what are the chances of being out while still being in?
and yet you both continued replying on the subject.
what are the chances of being out on a subject while still being in?
.
that can't be right, can it?
if a woman has 8 babies in her lifetime and half of them die in the day they are born she still has 4, which is above the replacement rate.
i like you.I operate on quantum probabilities so I can exist in a superposition of being in and out until somebody observes me.
i'm honestly not baiting anyone, just passing time that's all, like you.I replied to a poster that posts well on many subjects.
I‘m out from your silly question that seems to be more about you wanting to bait posters than actually debate.
I’ll set you a wine drinking question, how did the universe start, or to put it another way what was there before there was nothing and did nothing ever exist?i'm honestly not baiting anyone, just passing time that's all, like you.
don't go taking me too seriously, blue.
it was a wine-drinking question, they are often silly questions but worth asking.
i read somewhere that we are close.and the population of the earth would be decreasing… which it demonstrably is not even close to doing.