The Post General Election Thread

[stony]

[bigimg]http://memeguy.com/photos/images/ever-feel-stuck-in-a-rut-going-in-circles-54821.gif[/bigimg]

 

[Lucky13]

Good god!!

lol, thought the same. i mean wtf is it with these people. worse than rags in defeat.

But none of the Tories on here has offered any convincing argument for more cuts, beyond the Central Office propaganda pumped out by The Mail & Telegraph. SWP's Back is by far the best of what is a pretty sorry bunch, who just trot out cliches or resort to sarcasm

Like most people, I meekly accepted the argument that we needed deep cuts to reduce the deficit without questioning. Then, when I actually did my own research and asked questions, I could see it was complete baloney. The so-called recovery is based on higher consumer spending, not higher productivity and Further cuts will make things worse. If the government actually invested money in infrastructure and paying public servants decent wages, that would help drive up output-based wage rises and increase growth. That would increase tax revenues and GDP, leading to reduction of deficits and debt as a proportion of GDP being much lower. That's not being left or right wing; that's being economically literate.

How will increasing public sector pay increase private sector pay?

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

lol, thought the same. i mean wtf is it with these people. worse than rags in defeat.

But none of the Tories on here has offered any convincing argument for more cuts, beyond the Central Office propaganda pumped out by The Mail & Telegraph. SWP's Back is by far the best of what is a pretty sorry bunch, who just trot out cliches or resort to sarcasm

Like most people, I meekly accepted the argument that we needed deep cuts to reduce the deficit without questioning. Then, when I actually did my own research and asked questions, I could see it was complete baloney. The so-called recovery is based on higher consumer spending, not higher productivity and Further cuts will make things worse. If the government actually invested money in infrastructure and paying public servants decent wages, that would help drive up output-based wage rises and increase growth. That would increase tax revenues and GDP, leading to reduction of deficits and debt as a proportion of GDP being much lower. That's not being left or right wing; that's being economically literate.

How will increasing public sector pay increase private sector pay?

Because it increases consumer demand, thereby stimulating output.

Leave the thinking to the professionals son and go back to The Mail. There's a great story about 'diversity dolls' in there.

 

[Bill]

Good god!!

lol, thought the same. i mean wtf is it with these people. worse than rags in defeat.

But none of the Tories on here has offered any convincing argument for more cuts, beyond the Central Office propaganda pumped out by The Mail & Telegraph. SWP's Back is by far the best of what is a pretty sorry bunch, who just trot out cliches or resort to sarcasm

Like most people, I meekly accepted the argument that we needed deep cuts to reduce the deficit without questioning. Then, when I actually did my own research and asked questions, I could see it was complete baloney. The so-called recovery is based on higher consumer spending, not higher productivity and Further cuts will make things worse. If the government actually invested money in infrastructure and paying public servants decent wages, that would help drive up output-based wage rises and increase growth. That would increase tax revenues and GDP, leading to reduction of deficits and debt as a proportion of GDP being much lower. That's not being left or right wing; that's being economically literate.

do you think any proper tory cares about how the recovery is achieved?. no. just as long as we all have growth. well stay in business will do, on very thin ice during the liars time in office.

 

[Rascal]

Good god!!

lol, thought the same. i mean wtf is it with these people. worse than rags in defeat.

But none of the Tories on here has offered any convincing argument for more cuts, beyond the Central Office propaganda pumped out by The Mail & Telegraph. SWP's Back is by far the best of what is a pretty sorry bunch, who just trot out cliches or resort to sarcasm

Like most people, I meekly accepted the argument that we needed deep cuts to reduce the deficit without questioning. Then, when I actually did my own research and asked questions, I could see it was complete baloney. The so-called recovery is based on higher consumer spending, not higher productivity and Further cuts will make things worse. If the government actually invested money in infrastructure and paying public servants decent wages, that would help drive up output-based wage rises and increase growth. That would increase tax revenues and GDP, leading to reduction of deficits and debt as a proportion of GDP being much lower. That's not being left or right wing; that's being economically literate.

Hallelujah!

At last a common sense answer.

 

[hilts]

Good god!!

lol, thought the same. i mean wtf is it with these people. worse than rags in defeat.

But none of the Tories on here has offered any convincing argument for more cuts, beyond the Central Office propaganda pumped out by The Mail & Telegraph. SWP's Back is by far the best of what is a pretty sorry bunch, who just trot out cliches or resort to sarcasm

Like most people, I meekly accepted the argument that we needed deep cuts to reduce the deficit without questioning. Then, when I actually did my own research and asked questions, I could see it was complete baloney. The so-called recovery is based on higher consumer spending, not higher productivity and Further cuts will make things worse. If the government actually invested money in infrastructure and paying public servants decent wages, that would help drive up output-based wage rises and increase growth. That would increase tax revenues and GDP, leading to reduction of deficits and debt as a proportion of GDP being much lower. That's not being left or right wing; that's being economically literate.

Erm so you state these thick as shit right wingers just trot out cliches after reading the mail or telegraph, thus providing a huge cliche yourself, good one

And as a bright poster you managed to meekly accept we needed cuts, that doesn't appear very bright, you just accepted it without thinking or looking into it? But now your having a pop at others for just accepting it? Good one

And after your in depth investigations and brainstorming on economic matters you have come up with basically

If we like give more money to spend to those public sector workers, they will spend it in shops so the economy will grow coz of the taxes and that, genius

We are indeed not worthy

 

[Ronnie the Rep]

lol, thought the same. i mean wtf is it with these people. worse than rags in defeat.

But none of the Tories on here has offered any convincing argument for more cuts, beyond the Central Office propaganda pumped out by The Mail & Telegraph. SWP's Back is by far the best of what is a pretty sorry bunch, who just trot out cliches or resort to sarcasm

Like most people, I meekly accepted the argument that we needed deep cuts to reduce the deficit without questioning. Then, when I actually did my own research and asked questions, I could see it was complete baloney. The so-called recovery is based on higher consumer spending, not higher productivity and Further cuts will make things worse. If the government actually invested money in infrastructure and paying public servants decent wages, that would help drive up output-based wage rises and increase growth. That would increase tax revenues and GDP, leading to reduction of deficits and debt as a proportion of GDP being much lower. That's not being left or right wing; that's being economically literate.

Hallelujah!

At last a common sense answer.

Nonsense Rascal. He is just regurgitating your old claptrap about trickle down etc.

Go to bed!

 

[Lucky13]

But none of the Tories on here has offered any convincing argument for more cuts, beyond the Central Office propaganda pumped out by The Mail & Telegraph. SWP's Back is by far the best of what is a pretty sorry bunch, who just trot out cliches or resort to sarcasm

Like most people, I meekly accepted the argument that we needed deep cuts to reduce the deficit without questioning. Then, when I actually did my own research and asked questions, I could see it was complete baloney. The so-called recovery is based on higher consumer spending, not higher productivity and Further cuts will make things worse. If the government actually invested money in infrastructure and paying public servants decent wages, that would help drive up output-based wage rises and increase growth. That would increase tax revenues and GDP, leading to reduction of deficits and debt as a proportion of GDP being much lower. That's not being left or right wing; that's being economically literate.

How will increasing public sector pay increase private sector pay?

Because it increases consumer demand, thereby stimulating output.

Leave the thinking to the professionals son and go back to The Mail. There's a great story about 'diversity dolls' in there.

We could get more hours , we could get more jobs , but an increase in public sector pay will never increase private sector pay.

 

[Bill]

its May 2020 and the country is in the middle of an election frenzy. who will get in, who will lose their deposit, will Nigel quit again.nobody has a clue.

what we do know is rascal, pb and all the other sore losers will still be stamping their feet demanding a recount. its funny as fuck. i'll be near 66 by then so i wont give a fuck but i almost want a labour win (as if) just to shut the fuckers up. i mean fuck me what will they be like if the tories get a third term. ha ha. that is a "must see".

 

[kas_tippler]

Socialists still in bed whilst the go getters of the world are up and ready for another day of enterprise, even though its a Saturday! Gorgeous morning, the smell of sweet blossom wafting,birds singing and now lets get this GREAT country going!