Damocles said:
Germany is the conglomeration of numerous different and smaller countries into a unified whole which created an instant economic powerhouse over night. Measuring our successes versus the German economies, especially after the resulting damages of the World Wars is absolutely not a fair comparison.
Comparing different economies is always like that, a member of the audience during the election debates quizzed Ed Milliband on the contrast between our post recession performance and that of natural resource rich Canada and Australia, if you think about it, any one of the G8 economies could be judged as not being a "fair" comparison with the UK for a variety of reasons.
So the only comparison that produces anything we can use is "best practice", their modus operandi, and using that, on any number of measures, we can learn a lot from Germany, particularly the performance of the German Mittelstand....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mittelstand
"Mittelstand refers to small and medium-sized enterprises in German-speaking countries, especially in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Economic and business historians have been increasingly giving Mittelstand companies more and more credit for Germany's economic growth since the beginning of the 20th century, often under the name of hidden champions......
Mittelstand companies are "highly focused, achieving unprecedented efficiencies by designing a business model with a razor-thin focus and learning to do the one thing really well"; then to "compensate for their razor-thin focus . . . they diversify internationally and enjoy great economies of scale".
Mittelstand companies benefit from Germany's apprenticeship system, which provides highly skilled workers; and there is a
"collaborative spirit that generally exists between employer and employees . . . .
In the post-reunification recession, it seemed only natural to German workers to offer flexibility on wages and hours in return for greater job security.".
Spot the difference?