idahoblues
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Mar 2009
- Messages
- 20,286
Religion exists for .........wait for it ...............power and moneyReligion is the main cause of wars
Religion exists for .........wait for it ...............power and moneyReligion is the main cause of wars
Kind of.....proving the point then, isn't it? That religion seeks more money to remain powerful and influential. Without it, it begins to fail.Religion exists for .........wait for it ...............power and money
without a doubt, and so it continuesKind of.....proving the point then, isn't it? That religion seeks more money to remain powerful and influential. Without it, it begins to fail.
I don't agree actually, you look at the biggest wars the world has seen and religion was a tiny factor in them. Be it ww1 ww2 Vietnam Korea etc all were about economics , resources and power
No one does do they? Poverty and the effects of a global downturn combined with a punishment at Versailles were exploited by an extreme nationalist nutter who use economic inequality to gain a support base.you obviously didnt understand Hitler
Listen there are a lot of things I would not give religion a pass for and in many ways they have been internal to countries and localised not about war and global conflict. Religion has been a factor in wars but I still believe with a few exceptions that has been about religion as a tool to justify war and brainwash people rather than as an actual underlying reason.Neither is it factual to say that wars were driven solely by economics and power, especially if the ruler's of said nation believed they were doing so in order to protect the sanctity of the religion of that nation against a hostile aggressor. There's a certain amount of arrogance in your comment to give religion a 'pass', especially when you consider the factual evidence of centuries of brutality and suffering caused by those who did not die in an act of war, but suffered through the name of religious violence nonetheless. Not all 'wars' are fought on battlefields and many wars throughout history have held an underlying tone of religious hatred.
To be fair I have called out bill gates in this thread a couple of times as someone whose wealth will mainly go to fighting malaria and other good causes.Bill Gates hasn't started any wars recently. I don't think you can point to rich individuals as being responsible for wars. It's more about protecting/expanding the interests of certain corporations, which are far richer than any one individual. Politics shows that you can basically get away with any human rights abuses you want as long as you allow US corporations to make money in your country. But as soon as you try to stop them, you'll suddenly be part of the axis of evil.