kippaxblue76 said:Ric said:Lipton has always been a tool, comes across as a really odious bloke.
Love this clip of him from Chelsea TV - the presenter is great, she really gets under his skin.
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wt9elfwV8cU[/video]
Ha ha good find, what a tool.
Thatchersforearm said:kippaxblue76 said:Ric said:Lipton has always been a tool, comes across as a really odious bloke.
Love this clip of him from Chelsea TV - the presenter is great, she really gets under his skin.
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wt9elfwV8cU[/video]
Ha ha good find, what a tool.
I Really, really, really enjoyed that
LmaoRic said:Lipton has always been a tool, comes across as a really odious bloke.
Love this clip of him from Chelsea TV - the presenter is great, she really gets under his skin.
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wt9elfwV8cU[/video]
Mrmcfc said:LmaoRic said:Lipton has always been a tool, comes across as a really odious bloke.
Love this clip of him from Chelsea TV - the presenter is great, she really gets under his skin.
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wt9elfwV8cU[/video]
He looked like he was moments away from having a little cry.
Mike N said:The Chelsea woman didn't take any shit from the little shit. I love the dirty look he gave her when he realised he wasn't in for an easy ride.
As I said previously, you only need to check his comments out when we signed Aguerro to know he knows nothing about football.
Bollocks, not a chance would we have to wait to see how much we lost in a financial way before we could sue, also who determines the honest from the wankers in this allowable defence?FanchesterCity said:Sadly, it's not all that easy to sue these days.
The defamation laws changed in 2013 requiring requiring any profit making business (City) to prove serious financial loss regardless of what's said.
Also, if the person making the accusations has a genuine / honest belief, and that most honest people could come to the same conclusion as he/she did, then that's an allowable defence.
We wouldn't win this case. Sorry. It's not right what he said, and he clearly had very little knowledge of our business, but we'd simply not win this case.
bluemc1 said:Mike N said:The Chelsea woman didn't take any shit from the little shit. I love the dirty look he gave her when he realised he wasn't in for an easy ride.
As I said previously, you only need to check his comments out when we signed Aguerro to know he knows nothing about football.
where can i find that mate ?
fuck me he should have been sacked there and thenRic said:bluemc1 said:Mike N said:The Chelsea woman didn't take any shit from the little shit. I love the dirty look he gave her when he realised he wasn't in for an easy ride.
As I said previously, you only need to check his comments out when we signed Aguerro to know he knows nothing about football.
where can i find that mate ?
Presume he means this:
[video]http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xR0BzEeyTik[/video]
Lipton, of course, was vindicated. Aguero's two goals on his debut, within 30 minutes of being on the pitch, clearly demonstrated that he's "not the type of player to make an immediate impact". Arf.