Pablo ZZZ Peroni
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 May 2014
- Messages
- 2,448
Further legal documents released about the Premier League case:
I look forward to the translation....
I look forward to the translation....
Saved the scum from becoming debt free!Correct, has FFP actually saved a club, any club from going under?
The PL announced their investigation the very next day after UEFA did. 100% it originated from them.We don’t know if it relates to the emails, as we don’t have that information.
However, if the league is conducting an investigation, and request all relevant documentation covering a certain time period. Then we say we’re not prepared to supply that information, for whatever reasons. Our legal team would know the courts would find in favour of the investigating parties.
I guess you could say it is a case for Moulder and Skullduggery?Stuart Brennan and an excellent article:
What Man City's court defeat over FFP investigation secrecy actually means
The Court of Appeal decided that Manchester City's bid, supported by the Premier League, to stop publication of details of the ongoing investigation should be thrown out. But what does it all mean, and what have we learned?www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk
Thanks PB for that detail RE the effects of strangling investment.It can't because it's backwards looking.
A club is profitable and someone buys it. In their first year of ownership they overspend and take out cash so it breaks even. The second year they absolutely run it into the ground and it makes a loss.
But as long as the 3 year aggregate figure is within limits, it's OK under FFP. A few weeks later it can't pay its tax & NI and HMRC take action, put it into administration and it folds.
As far as I can tell (I'm no legal beagle) it just seems to be Judge Moulder's reasoning behind the decisions already published. They started to give me a migraine though so I may have missed something :(Further legal documents released about the Premier League case:
I look forward to the translation....
Basically, Messi is coming.As far as I can tell (I'm no legal beagle) it just seems to be Judge Moulder's reasoning behind the decisions already published. They started to give me a migraine though so I may have missed something :(
I had to Google him myself, but what a plonker.Anyone seen the Michael Crick tweets? Hilarious seeing someone with over 180,000 followers getting torn a new one by blues left, right, and centre!
At least he’s using reliable info……It's an excellent article but I think there's nothing there that wasn't in this thread 24 hours ago!