SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,078
Pulling out and apologising would certainly be a start.How on earth can the club rectify this?
Pulling out and apologising would certainly be a start.How on earth can the club rectify this?
Aren't the most popular YouTube footy shows the ones that endlessly moan about their club/team?City are still going to exist and play games, and 99% of your YouTube audience will be there watching them, I dont think you need to worry.
I'm going... just to take my seat with me!I thought no one was going any more? Well, most of Bluemoon that is.
He is chairman at the moment and a true footy fan, villa fanI find myself considering my position when I find myself on the same side as that privileged no nothing turd.
Jeez, I've got some that still have the tags on!Could you realistically wear a city jersey now? Look at the Crest and think what it is supposed to stand for, all wiped.
It stands for greed and corruption
City are a going concern. They make a profit. So there will be interest in buying us. There won't be any club debt if it isn't a leveraged buy out like the rags.can i ask the question ?
what if the top 6 clubs backers said ok then we will not spend a penny more in football. even sell your club and get back all the money we have invested in football ? what levels of debts would be left. i think city could be the worst place of the clubs could be like leeds a fire sale
Pulling out and apologising would certainly be a start.