The Tevez argument {merged - enough threads now }

Re: The Tevez counter argument!

Scooby Blue said:
Ja Salford Blue said:
Iv'e got a feeling him and his sly ba$tard of an agent will turn round and say he only refused to warm up and didnt refuse to play. I reckon he will say as he had been warming up for the majority of the 2nd half he was ready to come on and didnt need to warm up any more.

Ive got a bad feeling that the press will run with this and we will be made out as the bad guys in all this.

^^^ NO Sh*T Sherlock!! This has been the clear position of the Tevez camp since the morning after the game...listen to Paul McCarthy in Talksport interview for full thinking of tevez advisors.

With regard to the Tevez post-match interview...which so many think is conclusive evidence against Tevez...his camp will also have a counter-argument.

He will say that he was trying to do Mancini a favour by accepting responsibility for failing to come on as sub..."My mental state not right etc"...i.e. it was my decision...

and he will claim that truth of matter is that RM went into orbit when he refused to warm-up and that RM was so annoyed by this challenge to his authority and got so incensed in subsequent bust-up that he decided to rule Tevez out as a sub option even though tevez was "prepared to play".

The only bit of footage that in any way supports Tevez is the bit when he motions to get up but is clearly told in no uncertain terms to sit back down (presumably by Mancini) + Milner looks very puzzled next to him thinking "What the hell is going on here??"

This supports the Tevez argument that he fell out with RM over need to warm up....but was eventually prepared to do so (after much persuasion by coaching staff). But by now it was too late as RM too pissed off with Tevez's attitude.

From a "plea bargain" point of view, I would imagine that Tevez is going to accept lesser charge of "inappropriate behaviour" which results in lengthy internal suspension that will take us to Jan transfer window.
(i.e. he accepts he is guilty of insubordination but not outright mutiny).
City will put out press release confirming this...and Tevez Camp will put out press release expressing "regret" at incident...but welcoming official finding that accusation of "refusing to play" is not proven.


And here is the truth in what happened. Tevez was only refusing to continue warming up - not go out and play.
The saving grace for City is that the manager may use the "process of substition" as a kick up the ass to the players still on the pitch. Often a manager will parade a substitute on the sidelines to encourage the playing staff. The players who are running low on steam will often make it known at this point by having a little touch of a calf/ankle. Those who want to stay on will roll up their socks and look keen.

You failed Mr Tevez, you failed the fans and you failed the club.

Karma will get you. Maybe not in Manchester but she will catch you one day. In the meantime the board is up and it says 32. You're off son and keep on walking this time. We've had enough.
 
Re: The Tevez counter argument!

Tevez said after the game that his mind was not right and that he didnt want to play!
It was only next morning (after im sure Kia Jab had talked to him) he released another statement saying he refused to warmup.
This was the statement that included an apology to us fans.

Alot of media (inc Sky) are forgetting the origional statement made after the game and it may well be that statement that condems Tevez in the investigation!

Im sure the club will back Mancini and even if Tevez is not sacked, he will be sold in Jan for a knockdown price. Hopefully back to Sth.America!!
 
Re: The Tevez counter argument!

oakiecokie said:
Longsight-memories said:
eaamalyonEd Malyon


http://twitter.com/#!/eaamalyon


Exclusive from Fox Radio Argentina: Tevez declared in front of City tribunal that he refused to keep warming up NOT to go on. #MCFC

1 hour ago

Sounds like Kia J. has already sent a text from the tribunal.Tosser !!

Will this tribunal be filmed/recorded?
 
Re: The Tevez counter argument!

nijinskybell said:
oakiecokie said:
Longsight-memories said:
eaamalyonEd Malyon


http://twitter.com/#!/eaamalyon


Exclusive from Fox Radio Argentina: Tevez declared in front of City tribunal that he refused to keep warming up NOT to go on. #MCFC

1 hour ago

Sounds like Kia J. has already sent a text from the tribunal.Tosser !!

Will this tribunal be filmed/recorded?

Perhaps a film will be made from the eventual outcome !!
But who could play Tevez and who for Kia J. ?
Best supporting act "Garry Cooke" played by himself,after giving evidence !
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.