If the numbers are already at 6000+ and the plan continues to just build the South Stand first, then someone has cocked-up.
Provision also has to be made for 1200 visiting away fans who will occupy the top tier, as part of their 3600 allocation.
I suspect the reason City are hedging their bets is because these deposits are not necessarily from 'new or lapsed' fans.
They are probably people who already make up the present 47,000 capacity, but have been locked-out of the 36,000 season ticket limit, pick and choose their games, tempted by the gamble of a £100 deposit for a £299 season ticket.
We have gone on about operation one end for a few years, I actually think it would be good to see what the aesthetics are for 12 months.
Question, what is to stop City also adding the 2000 seats around the perimeter in the close-season?
Surely that would take the capacity to just under 50,000 for the start of the next season and an eventual capacity of 56,250 when the South Stand is completed?
A decent capacity, anywhere.
If standing was finally given the go-ahead, you are talking a capacity well over 60,000 if the bottom tier of the South Stand was to get rail seating, and that's without spending another £40m on the North Stand.