City_Sean
Well-Known Member
Don't want to labor the point any further than it already has, but does the referee not want to to and actually watch the replay to see whether Rashford does actually interfere?
He's literally just taking his own view of it and the fact the linesman said he didn't touch it, when he's got access to watch a replay
I heard that VAR didn't actually get involved, but why? Given the linesman gave offside, surely they all have to find conclusive proof that he wasn't actually offside in order to overturn the on field decisio ? The linesman gave offside because he thought he interfered, so why did he change his decision based on the various levels of interference that an offside player can gave
I think the more I watch the goal, the more shocked I get, and I'm not normally one to get on a refs back. I just want to know what made the linesman go from giving offside, to them both agreeing it wasn't, without actually watching the replay of the goal
It's totally obvious why. Attwell is a coward who is incapable of forming his own decision.
Like I've said United are genuinely shite. Their manager has them playing like Jose, they defend deep and play long ball.
They've had multiple games this season where they've relied on the referee.
Liverpool, Arsenal and now us. They're still one point behind us and if the officials did their jobs it would be 8+. Look at the disallowed penalties today and the Martial one given when we slapped them 6-3.
I can't wait until they draw a few games and the narrative goes back to them not being backed in the market.