M
M
There's nothing remotely shallow about not voting for people you don't like. It's an entirely natural human reaction.There's a few at the top of Labour that don't come across as particularly pleasant. Corbyn, Abbot, McDonnell and Watson. Now of course, that should have no bearing on whether Labour will get back into power; it should be all about policies, not personalities. But we are all aware (well; all apart from the members of the Labour party) that if the great unwashed see someone as untrustworthy or (in some way) "not nice", that may well impact on how they vote. People can be very shallow.
Wtf? Now there is a man with his finger on the pulse. not.
I view the whole anti-Corbyn stance by the mainstream media in much the same way as I see their anti-City rhetoric. Widespread negativity in the media doesn't change our perception of City - in fact we dig-in and react accordingly (supporters that is, rather than our passive Club officials).
I get the impression that Labour is trying to do the same - ie fuck-off Murdoch et al, you can peddle your lies, misinform your moronic audiences, but you don't tell us who leads our party you bunch of twats.
Sadly this is not likely to be a fight that they will ultimately win.
The polishing, refinement and preparation of Dianne Abbot into a future Party Leader might at least give a little optimism that a brighter future lies ahead.
I hope so because the current free rein position of the Conservatives (as with any Party in their dominant position) is a worrying scenario.
You are definitely bating with that post. Dianne Abbott next leader and optimism. She could not even spell leader.
Media myths of the biased right wing press. The BBC is so left wing it's untrue. I suppose the guardian is well balanced in its views.
Typical. They'll claw back a few hundred grand fleecing unsuspecting taxpayers who strayed into the lane, then hail it as a roaring success.
On the positive side, though, are they painting the lines a nice colour? And hiring a few extra enforcement gestapo from some obscure African state?
You need to check yours. Of course throwing vast amounts of cash at bailing out a banking catastrophe (that Labour presided over), made matters much worse.
However after a short period of budget surplus (due to spending restraint) in the late 1990s, the UK went into budget deficit under Labour of 2-3% of GDP between 2002-2007. A bloody disgrace considering the economy was growing by between 2% and 3% for much of the period.
Basically they spent more than we could afford, as usual.
Labour presided over ......correct I'll give you that.....however created by deregulation of the financial services sector done by the tory's on behalf of their mates and still being paid for by the taxpayer to the tune of £7billion this year whilst we see increasing homeless on the streets , the NHS on its knees, Social Care totally F*cked , pensions for women being raided, and the only policy the tories can come up with is to reduce the befefits of the disabled.......
they're tossers mate,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, open your mind