That seems a bit like a Hollywood film plot to me.
It’s not like we’ve taken UEFA and FFP to court because it’s an illegal business practice. We’re in the dock trying to defend ourselves that we haven’t broken FFP.
Win or lose FFP is still there, and there would have to be someone who is prepared to take UEFA to court over the illegality of FFP, never mind the years it’d take to go through that process. This process won’t have that outcome, it’s a completely separate issue that we aren’t even fighting.
I'm not sure you read my comment properly. FFP will still be there, but you will have an AC and IC who, if City are correct, lead a politically motivated prosecution ignoring proof from the accused party that they'd done nothing wrong.
That's going to destroy the credibility of the entire process, especially so soon after Leterme and the IC deliberately let PSG off the hook by delaying passing their conclusions to the AC until the time period elapsed.
And I absolutely guarantee, if we get no punishment, there will be dozens of leaks from the usual suspects, and those will make the thing look a farce as well.
So the AC/IC chambers as an "independent" system will be dead and need to be replaced with something,
That alone will be pretty big changes at UEFA and FFP.
Seperate from that is a seeming lack of enthusiasm for FFP to remain in it's current guise. Covid-19 is going to cause a lot of problems, and UEFA have already been loosening it to accommodate new big owners in Milan and I'm sure the Saudi's will put the squeeze on if they get Newcastle.
I don't think it's unrealistic at all that FFP dies and is replaced in a few years regardless of the outcome of our hearing, but if we win, it could definitely bring things forward.