United thread 2013/14

Status
Not open for further replies.
Would be a very good signing for them make no mistake. Even with Moyes managing him he'll put in some good performances for them and if he and RVP form a good partnership it could help them get 4th. Clever by Chelsea though as the rags are no threat to them and the rags have to play us and Arsenal and Liverpool so Mata could help them to the title by not even playing for them.
 
I wanted to type something meaningful, insightful even............ but I haven't stopped laughing so I can't. In Moyes we trust. 67 mill for Mata and Fellani, who the f*ck allowed Moyes near the piggy bank.
 
How do you get the fans on your side just before you go into a cup semi final in poor form. Leak a story about a third party bidding for a player.

Who is the 3rd party?
delboy-davidbyrne.jpg
 
RandomJ said:
Would be a very good signing for them make no mistake. Even with Moyes managing him he'll put in some good performances for them and if he and RVP form a good partnership it could help them get 4th. Clever by Chelsea though as the rags are no threat to them and the rags have to play us and Arsenal and Liverpool so Mata could help them to the title by not even playing for them.

Yep especially with the fixtures coming up like Pool-Everton, Pool-Arsenal, Spurs-Everton in next 3 weeks, while United will have pretty easy run. Going into this with the boost of Mata could really help them to get 4th what is the best they can do this season. (Also with CL money Mata's price is back .)
 
samharris said:
supercrystal7 said:
Vienna_70 said:
I think he is.

If he was a regular in the starting XI at the Kremlin, then maybe, but he's a player whom the manager doesn't like.

Merlin cost, what, around £25 million?

Mata is not as good as Silva, IMHO, and he's not a first-team regular, therefore not worth as much as we paid four our little genius.
Prices have moved on since then. Silva now would cost 30 million, which is what I think Mata is worth. Him not starting at Chelsea makes no difference, he is still arguably their best player. Good managers don't pick their best players, but the best team.

NO..good manager build the team around the best players.. why do you think the scum are shite without Rooanrapist.
Yes and what happens if you have two great players that need to play different styles or a young player with more potential than an old one? Ferguson did the same thing when he got rid of Ince, Hughes and Kanchelskis for younger players he believed were more talented. He then did the same thing with RVN to change the style.

As for last year United won the league pretty much without Rooney. He was phased out of the team and was almost certainly going to be sold. Rooney was still their second best player.

Gomez was still a better striker than Mandzukic, but Mandzukic was a better fit.

Individually none of Lucas, Allen or Henderson are better than old Gerrard, but the Liverpool team is probably better when those three start together.
 
What's this third party shite ? Can someone stop laughing long enough to explain it please
 
bobmcfc said:
What's this third party shite ? Can someone stop laughing long enough to explain it please
I'm puzzled by this as well. Either they've authorised a bid or they haven't.

The only thing I can think is that Woodward is so incompetent at transfers that they have an agent or other intermediary doing the deal for them.
 
supercrystal7 said:
samharris said:
supercrystal7 said:
Prices have moved on since then. Silva now would cost 30 million, which is what I think Mata is worth. Him not starting at Chelsea makes no difference, he is still arguably their best player. Good managers don't pick their best players, but the best team.

NO..good manager build the team around the best players.. why do you think the scum are shite without Rooanrapist.
Yes and what happens if you have two great players that need to play different styles or a young player with more potential than an old one? Ferguson did the same thing when he got rid of Ince, Hughes and Kanchelskis for younger players he believed were more talented. He then did the same thing with RVN to change the style.

As for last year United won the league pretty much without Rooney. He was phased out of the team and was almost certainly going to be sold. Rooney was still their second best player.

Gomez was still a better striker than Mandzukic, but Mandzukic was a better fit.

Individually none of Lucas, Allen or Henderson are better than old Gerrard, but the Liverpool team is probably better when those three start together.

We are talkin maureen here.. he sent Lukaku on loan yet kept Torres And Ba at Chelsea..

Managers leave their best players out for reasons such as injuries,loss of form,hissy fits etc..

Are you seriously telling me that Chelsea are a better team without Mata and this is why hes not been playing??

no...Its cos of maureens ego..
 
Does Uncle Malc have have those Spanish Solicitor's on the case again? oh wait, they denied having anything to do with them over Cesc Fab.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.