United Thread - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
They can shove their apologies up their bent arses,as the fact these incidents keep happening,at the same ground(s) and in favour of the same team(s),means their words mean fuck all.......its purely lip service as we are being treated like fucking idiots.

Get the audio in real time broadcast around the stadium,let the crowd here how these bent cunts/fuckwits reach their decisions.Only then can we have transparency and maybe an end to this fucking farce.
 
Last edited:
What they’ve basically done here is nobody will be allowed to contest querie or confront
Blatant incompetence and cheating bias.
I've thought for a long time that the whistling wankers have hidden behind yellow cards to shut up players who have done not much more than query why they have not been awarded a free kick when an oppo player has attempted to kick shite out of them. And what the incompetence leads to is players applying their own version of the LotG and finding themselves on the end of a red for basically objecting to a game-long pummelling that hasn't been dealt with. The best example I can think of is the roughhouse that Bernardo seemed to be subjected to each game last season. Thankfully he was too professional to end up with the red.
 
Yeah I always work on the assumption that they're the equivalent of 1-0 up when they kick off.

There's always a decision their way or against whoever they play which is or could be game changing. Been the same all my life and with every game now on TV & cameras everywhere they've had to pull VAR out of the hat to try and muddy the waters.

To paraphrase Buzz Lightyear.....cheats, cheats everywhere.
Or when City win…

527707BE-8F12-451C-928E-A6F12D22A136.jpeg
 
Ten Rags in the post match presser saying [penalty incident] the two Wolves players knocked each other out.

tu3xhUI.gif
 
Generally if the keeper is nowhere near the ball it's given, where the keeper has barged into the player. If it's the other way around, or a 50/50 clash it's not given. If the keeper gets a touch on the ball it's not given but he wasn't even close to getting there. It's the fact that VAR didn't even look at it, or looked but made a decision in 0.03 seconds that's suspicious. They'll spend 5 minutes looking at an offside that's clear even without a specialist equipment but not at a clash like that. It's time that we at least had access to what is said by the refs and the video ref at Stockley Park. They do in other sports.
Keepers go down like they’ve be shot by a 50 Cal, when a dragonflies knitting lands on em, FOUL… they wipe a player out by punching them in the face or whatever and it’s not even a foul?? Let alone a stonewall penalty ..
They get way too much protection, unless of course they play for City …!
 
Keepers go down like they’ve be shot by a 50 Cal, when a dragonflies knitting lands on em, FOUL… they wipe a player out by punching them in the face or whatever and it’s not even a foul?? Let alone a stonewall penalty ..
They get way too much protection, unless of course they play for City …!
Case in point the Everton "goal" on Saturday.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.