Gorton_Tubster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 16,355
- Location
- Riding the blue tidal wave.
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Thats funny.
I agree 100% The rags are a perfect example of a football club whose primary aim is not to win titles, but instead to make money for the owner. Think about that for a minute. A sporting team competing professionally in a sport, but not to win, instead they want to win just enough to guarantee their income. It is a perversion of the idea of sport, really. That is how the american owned clubs work. How anybody who truly loves the sport of football can think these clubs are good for the sport is a riddle to me. These kind owners are parasites on the sport, nothing less.I've said all along that their aim has been to meet targets. Theese targets are quite explicit:
That's their football objectives and what they base their revenue assumptions on. Anything more is a bonus, not an expectation. The first of those is key though. We saw LVG sacked even though he won them a trophy, because he didn't achieve that.
- Finish top four
- Get to the CL knockout stage
- Get to the QF of both domestic cups
I don't think so. He appears ok to me. He's basically called a player out in public, which is what Pep has done previously.Or maybe he's a shit manager looking for someone to blame?
You're wrong. He's a very clever guy actually.The epitome of a waste of a fathers spunk
Reacting like the spoilt twat of a child who gets an Action Man for Christmas, opens the box only to find it empty and his dad telling him it's the Action Man Deserter model
Unfortunately Manchester United can stagnate and decline but as long as they remain a top eight team their valuation is still likely to rise.
The growth and dominance of the PL ensures that.
Brighton, Liverpool, Spurs all demonstrate that a decent manager and 3 or 4 outstanding players is enough to challenge at the top. None of these have deep quality in the squad.1. City are the best squad in the League.
2. Arsenal have great quality.
3. Liverpool look genuine contenders this year.
4. Brighton could battle for the top if they cut out the odd stupid result.
5. Chelsea with a few more games could come good (I can see progress...I think).
6. Spurs have a decent manager who I think will eak the most points from a somewaht limited squad.
7. Newcastle will do a lot better than their current form suggests.
So that's 7 teams that have quality optimistic managers, quality squads, definite styles of play (for the most part), no in-fighting, no fan protests (maybe a smidge at Chelsea), no weird takeover shennanigans, etc etc.
Versus United having a manager who seems to be getting in mood day by day, few decent players and very strange signings, a confusion on how to play, in-fighting, fan protests, disconnect with execs, etc, etc.
And then there are the other teams in the league who could give anyone a game on their day (e.g. Villa, West Ham, Palace, Brentford).
I daren't suggest it but could we finish the season as PL winners as United get.. no I can't even say it for fear of jinxing it but it rhymes with... rag elation.
The tarquins did exactly the same thing.I agree 100% The rags are a perfect example of a football club whose primary aim is not to win titles, but instead to make money for the owner. Think about that for a minute. A sporting team competing professionally in a sport, but not to win, instead they want to win just enough to guarantee their income. It is a perversion of the idea of sport, really. That is how the american owned clubs work. How anybody who truly loves the sport of football can think these clubs are good for the sport is a riddle to me. These kind owners are parasites on the sport, nothing less.