KentBlue
Well-Known Member
Awful, isn't it? They shouldn't finish mid table, they should finish each season at the foot of whatever division they are in and subsequently go bankrupt.
United Thread | 2024/25
- Thread starter Thaksinssoldier
- Start date
Scaring Europe to Death
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2014
- Messages
- 4,349
It would be interesting to know how much the City/United demographic split has changed in the school playground as I suspect the youngest generation (Alpha?) will almost reflect the opposite of the early baby boomers in the 1950s who only really knew the Busby Babes and weren't old enough to remember the 1930s when City were the dominant force.
That generation are now largely irrelevant and will soon be replaced by a significantly larger proportion of City supporters who'll enter adulthood to a backdrop of sky blue dominance, and won't give a flying fuck about George Best.
Talksport must be shitting themselves
That generation are now largely irrelevant and will soon be replaced by a significantly larger proportion of City supporters who'll enter adulthood to a backdrop of sky blue dominance, and won't give a flying fuck about George Best.
Talksport must be shitting themselves
hihosilva
Well-Known Member
United have posted losses of more than £92m for three of the last four years and have now recorded total losses of £372.8m over the previous five years and £257.4m across the last three years, but insist they are sticking by financial rules drawn up by the Premier League and UEFA.
The Premier League's Profit and Sustainability Rules allow for losses of £105m over a three-year period, but United claim they are inside that limit when allowable losses, such as investment in infrastructure, academies and women's football, are taken into account.
I would say one rule for one & one for another!
The Premier League's Profit and Sustainability Rules allow for losses of £105m over a three-year period, but United claim they are inside that limit when allowable losses, such as investment in infrastructure, academies and women's football, are taken into account.
I would say one rule for one & one for another!
Tricky_Trev
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 32,530
Just the £257m losses over the last 3 years when FFP only allows for £105m.
Mysterious, suspicious ‘allowances’ to cover the difference no doubt.
Relegate them.
Mysterious, suspicious ‘allowances’ to cover the difference no doubt.
Relegate them.
the more i hear from berrada, the more it seems he was just a functionary, very good with business speak and being in the right place but very little substance.
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
Can't be true that. After all, some United fans insist that they always live within their means and never post losses. FFP/PSR aside, they flung a lot of shit at us when we were making large losses in the early years of the takeover. At least there was a means to an end when we were doing it as ultimately it led to us becoming the best team on the planet and the club is now also very profitable. They just keep spending fuck tons of money every year and never get any better!
Last edited:
Another one to add to their Hall of mysoginistic infamy - what happens to these fuckers in there ?
Even they don’t purposefully recruit wife beaters and abusers do they ?
9 kids as well apparently- Kyles got some work to do !
Even they don’t purposefully recruit wife beaters and abusers do they ?
9 kids as well apparently- Kyles got some work to do !