Bigga
Well-Known Member
So he would only rape, sexually abuse women he is friends with? He only has to meet her once to abuse her
What a stretch!! Who has said anything remotely close?!!
So he would only rape, sexually abuse women he is friends with? He only has to meet her once to abuse her
I may have misinterpreted your post. I do think its possible he doesn't remember her or know her, but he cant claim he never met her when there is actual evidence he did so. BUT he did once say he has possibly the best memory of any one ever so theres that :)What a stretch!! Who has said anything remotely close?!!
The key point on the last line is an opinion not a statement of fact, and his background suggests that it is a biased opinion from a Trump fan, a bit like your posts.And here's where being 'objective' works well; is any of the tweet a lie??
Do your VERY BEST to try and answer it, cos I gave context in my post.
Just once, try.
What men? Who?So you CAN'T back up your dumb position?
As I said to the other poster men get found GUILTY on rape charges that turn out to be false, yet you "accept the findings of a jury and don’t need to look at the evidence they considered".
And all I asked was for you to post the evidence they found Trump guilty on.
You are as DENSE as I thought you were and MORE.
What men? Who?
Name them?
When were they found guilty? Where and by whom?
How was it overturned. What evidence was presented first time around and at the appeal.
Come on. Surely you have this to hand.
Agree. I don't think not knowing her is a defence though, which is a point I was trying to make clumsily earlier.
I will say, I didn't think he would be found liable. It was long ago and there is no proof. But, he was a disaster when questoned and declined to show up to offer rebuttal. There's probably a good chance he did do something based on what he's said but probably shouldn't be enough.