aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
you missed an s.We've noticed that with your inane ramblings about soccer.
you missed an s.We've noticed that with your inane ramblings about soccer.
I don't think there is doubt about the Earth's cyclic effect with the proof of multiple past ice ages. Like you say, people will jump on it to use it as a political (exaggerated) argument against it, say like, fossil fuel salesmen. See my post just then to @aguero93:20 - your post to prompted me to expand on that one:Ah the cyclic theory, which has been totally dumbed down and simplified into a reason for continuing to destroy the earth and its atmosphere, thats without taking into consideration we should be in a cooling phase not a heating up phase if you do believe in the Earth's cyclic effect.
If you wont accept that global warming is harmful, what about the fact we are going through a mass extinction of animals, whereby the number of known animals is dropping rather than increasing, only the third mass extinction in the planet's history, the other 2 were due to ice ages, not the planet heating up, the only reason for this mass extinction is the willful destruction of animal habits both terrestrial and aquatic by humans. Something largely ignored and never discussed as its too uncomfortable.
Not only is it wrong to dismiss global warming, it is incredibly short sighted, fossil fuels will run out eventually, even the most backward of climate change deniers agree with that, so isnt it better to try and be at the forefront on new technologies, to try and corner as much of the market as possible with the most advanced forms of renewable energy rather than forget about it and leave it to everyone else to sort out?
Right yeah, so cold temperates colder, hot hotter? I only saw a bit about the Sahara and Americas - I'm not remotely a scientist.I think you need to read a hell of a lot more, your science is very simplistic view. For example there is every chance that Britain will be one of the most effected areas of the world, as a shift or end of the gulf stream would see temperatures drop significantly not rise.
Over the millennia we will evolve, grow gills and swim the oceans, the lizard people are all powerful and this is their master planYou live on an (apparently) overpopulated island nation dependant on a warm ocean current and you're not worried about our surrounding sea area getting flooded with iceberg melt?
No need to worry about that either, the sun is going to die eventually anyway.Over the millennia we will evolve, grow gills and swim the oceans, the lizard people are all powerful and this is their master plan
See last post to Paul Lakes' Left Knee. Like he said, I'm probably looking with a simplistic view - I'm not a scientist. I was originally talking from the perspective of damage to the Earth, not what we know of the Earth. So yeah ha, while I might have said it's over exaggerated, we could still be fucked within that. Isn't the moon moving away from Earth or something anyway?You live on an (apparently) overpopulated island nation dependant on a warm ocean current and you're not worried about our surrounding sea area getting flooded with iceberg melt?
Good it's a shit paperNo need to worry about that either, the sun is going to die eventually anyway.
Yep, by 1.5 inches a year over 385k miles, even less worrying than the next ice age :)Isn't the moon moving away from Earth or something anyway?
Regardless of whether or not climate change is real, why should we be wasteful and disrespectful to the earth when cleaner more viable options are available? Doesn't make sense or maybe it does $$$$$$