metalblue
Well-Known Member
Jail instead of gaol.
Should have instead of ought to have.
Should have instead of ought to have.
Cheesy said:Should of.
Could of.
Would of.
It's fucking have you thick, illiterate, backwards, simple, uneducated, ignorant cunts!
(Sorry, really bothers me.)
Cheesy said:Should of.
Could of.
Would of.
It's fucking have you thick, illiterate, backwards, simple, uneducated, ignorant *****!
(Sorry, really bothers me.)
quiet_riot said:'Got another thing coming' (it's think, as wrong as it sounds)
UUBlue said:Carver said:UUBlue said:It's not always incorrect to use these forms though.
Please explain when it is correct, except for when you are quoting what somebody else said or wrote ad verbatim. (For example if they are the lyrics to a song).
I would, of course, explain it to you if you were unable to work it out for yourself.
Granted, the offending words in the sentence above are separated by a comma, but they are legitimately used consecutively.
Should 'of' be used instead of 'have'? I think in most cases, no.