Mister Appointment said:
Kippax Street 1880 said:
That may be but would you gamble our season on it ? Keep Alfie or pay Bony's release clause. 3 strikers, 2 of which are terribly injury prone is suicidal for a club with our ambitions. We might end up getting away with it but its a huge risk for me.
It's really not gambling our season on it. People are making way too much of this potential sale IMO. We have played the last 3 season effectively with 3 centre forwards. Last season Jovetic was unavailable all season and Negredo invisible from Jan onwards. The season before Balo was sold in January and barely kicked a ball before that. The season before that Tevez was awol for the meat of the season.
This is simply good business on City's part. Obviously we need better luck with injuries to Kun and Jovetic this season, however I'd MUCH rather we were relying on Jovetic than on Negredo simply because I think Jojo's the better player.
Also City were interested in Falcao. That means that Negredo leaving eventually will lead to an incoming. I'd rather we kept our powder dry and banked the Negredo money than kept him and had Valencia sign someone else. In a year we'd want rid of Negredo anyway and wouldn't have gotten half the money we're gonna get now.
And one more thing. Today isn't over yet. I'm not saying we will sign anyone because I have no idea. However I wouldn't totally rule it out because of what a few journalists are saying. Don't imagine any of them have got a hotline to Txiki.
I think there's a difference between only needing 3 players effectively when you have 4 options, and only needing 3 players effectively when you've only got 3 to start with. Yes, in the past few seasons, due to injury, suspension, golf playing in South America etc we've only really had 3 options available at any given time, but that's because 1 of our options have been unavailable. If one of our options becomes unavailable once Negredo (potentially) has left, then we've got 2 options, with non-one on the bench to make a change with.
If the nearly £24m fee is to be believed then that's a very tempting price, given it's getting on for a 50% mark-up on what we paid for him, but that doesn't change the fact there's more risk entering the season with 3 strikers than there is with 4.
I'd hope that we'd be looking at a replacement, if not now then certainly for January. Going with 3, and no viable youth player to step up, is unnecessarily risky.