It does, doesn't it?
The single, brief replay of the Stones offside didn't prove anything. It could have conceivably been offside, but we didn't see any lines or a clear view of the moment the ball was passed in conjunction with the lines on the screen to show the position of the last defender.
Now you would think that if they wanted to convince viewers that there was nothing shady going on, then it would be in their interest to show us ALL the evidence for EVERY marginal decision, but they don't, and that's telling.