cleavers
Moderator
Had to laugh at "thicker lines" are they going to use thicker VAR officials too, it would be pretty hard.
I think it guarantees Rashford the Golden boot as his nose will be onside.Basically taking into account that the TV frame rate cant handle the speed of the game, something that many on here have been preaching since it’s inception.
What prompted the change, did United lose out on yet another dodgy penalty because they were more than Sterling’s armpit air offside?
I've always favored VAR - but recognized that it was a work in progress. One of my friends hates(hated) VAR with a major source of frustration hand ball VAR rulings - not the fault of VAR, but rather, of the old hand ball rule.VAR now working much better:
1) Faster decisions without holding up the game;
2) Hand ball rule fixed so stupid penalties/disallowed goals now a thing of the past.
Bound to revert to shit when PIGMOL run it for the PL again.VAR now working much better:
1) Faster decisions without holding up the game;
2) Hand ball rule fixed so stupid penalties/disallowed goals now a thing of the past.
VAR now working much better:
1) Faster decisions without holding up the game;
2) Hand ball rule fixed so stupid penalties/disallowed goals now a thing of the past.
Just have to work with what you've got even if you have no cameras at all. Not me mate, one P Walton explaining to Camel Gob on BT. Tripped over it the other night funnily enough.Was it the Wales game when UEFA had only 1 camera working. Wonder how they would have handled any controversial decisions?
Is that how they work it at United and Liverpool, just ignore in favour of the home team?Just have to work with what you've got even if you have no cameras at all. Not me mate, one P Walton explaining to Camel Gob on BT. Tripped over it the other night funnily enough.