Millwallawayveteran1988
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Sep 2010
- Messages
- 38,411
It should be based on feet for me. If they are onside then it should be ok.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Var debate 2019/20
- Thread starter Chi-town blues
- Start date
The offside by 1mm is not a fact. With a frame rate of 50 frames per second and a running speed of 10 metres per second, a player can move 20 cm between frames. This gives a margin of error of 20 cm based on one simple calculation.
Add further "errors" such as
which frame to use when the ball is played?
is the ball played when it first touches or leaves the foot?
Which body part to use when taking offside measurements?
Is the correct perspective used?
Does the camera compensate for not being in line and adjust perspective and vertical alignment?
What about level being on side?
What is level ? Is there a tolerance used?
And you believe an offside by 1mm is a fact?
My point is it’s the same for all teams the offside var rule
That ultimate list doesn't mention rodri being wrestled to the ground v spurs, the taa handball v Liverpool, that's quickly off of the top of my head. I'm sure there are more. I'll re have a look at the list when I get home, the Liverpool at +2 seems highly dubious
When that list doesn’t mention Liverpool v City, it becomes useless.
They are the actual decisions that have been reversed from the original on field decision. If it's not in there it wasn't overturned.
squirtyflower
Well-Known Member
Unfortunately notNever gonna happen though...
Be even better if the managers were allowed to interview on air, not some toady lackey from the Grauniad.
give it to gordon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 17,424
- Team supported
- Manchester City
talksport ran a league table if VAR had been used correctly after 13 matches it had
1 Liverpool 35 pts real points 37, real position 1
2 City ……..30 pts real points 28 , real position 3
3 Chelsea..27 pts real points 26 , real position 4
could post as I don't know how to upload from my pictures !
of course doesn't mean much as a good win can build momentum the same way a lost can lose momentum
1 Liverpool 35 pts real points 37, real position 1
2 City ……..30 pts real points 28 , real position 3
3 Chelsea..27 pts real points 26 , real position 4
could post as I don't know how to upload from my pictures !
of course doesn't mean much as a good win can build momentum the same way a lost can lose momentum
It's a bit pointless if we're not considering the bulk of the VAR mistakes.They are the actual decisions that have been reversed from the original on field decision. If it's not in there it wasn't overturned.
give it to gordon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 17,424
- Team supported
- Manchester City
was thinking the same !It's a bit pointless if we're not considering the bulk of the VAR mistakes.
Cellarite
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 25,964
- Team supported
- Manchester City
So if VAR completely ignores an incident, it doesn’t count as favourable for a team? Right.They are the actual decisions that have been reversed from the original on field decision. If it's not in there it wasn't overturned.
squirtyflower
Well-Known Member
Why do you think it took them so long on Friday?said this a while back....a few things will start going against them now their 15 points ahead & the damage is done,also you reckon Mahrez would have got that penalty 2 months ago?
As soon as the showed it on the big screen on the other side of the pitch my mate and i could both see clearly it was a penalty.
It took Atkinson, Stockley Park and old mother Riley two and a half minutes to figure it out.
How do we know what’s going on during that time?
Did they check it out with Riley, who then remembered he said they’d made an error with the Silva stamp back in August so we’d better give this one, reluctantly, otherwise there’s a point of reference for some wrong doing?
No wonder fans can see conspiracies when the whole set up is in secrecy with no openness or questioning allowed.
Here we have a media guy leading the calls for changes to the way VAR is communicated to the fans. Fuck how it's communicated, get rid of it and don't fall for the same crap again. It's the media that campaigned for years for VAR, not the players, not the club's and certainly not the fans.
VAR was introduced to give Sky and co more time to analysis decisions, stay on air longer and sell more ads. This farce is on them and any idiot that fell for their bullshit over the last 5 or 6 years. Having Mike Riley explain that Pukki's toenail or Jota's arse was a millimetre offside won't make the decision any more palatable.
As much as VAR sucks, I don't want to go back to the days of referee's having carte blanche to do whatever they liked. I watch a lot of Bundesliga, and they have nowhere near the amount of Var controversies as the Premier League does, I heard its the same with Serie A. With us, its a week in week out thing, the actual matches are now just a side show. Things definitely need to change, but is the alternative going back to how things were, really the best we can come up with? It's like choosing between a turd sandwich, and a bowl of puke.
https://footballisfixed.blogspot.com/2019/12/insider-trading-market-control.html