If you watch the replay again even if Sigurdsson was ruled offside it's because he completely taken out by a Utd player. Minimum penalty.
We know what’s going on so do the majority of fans of other clubs,but the premier league don’t seem to give to fucks,it’s all about the desperation to get them into that forth spot,next Sunday’s game should be an interesting one shouldn’t it ..Im at the point i cant even get angry anymore because im sat watching and expecting the very things we say time and time again and they never fail to deliver.
100% a goal had utd snatched that late winner and everyone knows it and 100% not a goal if it costs them any points in their quest for CL football.
If anything he helped the donut thief
No expenses spared for those graphics. ;-)
I trust that next Sunday's match will fall as an extreme embarrassment to the red scum. I'm withdrawing myself from bluemoon for a week, stay positive my friends.We know what’s going on so do the majority of fans of other clubs,but the premier league don’t seem to give to fucks,it’s all about the desperation to get them into that forth spot,next Sunday’s game should be an interesting one shouldn’t it ..
You're right mate but they disallowed it as I think they said he was interfering with play and distracted the donut thief which was bollocks as de gea was already going the wrong way.Its early ! But can a attacker be off side if it comes of a defender last ? Sure I have seen players score when its come of a defender last making the attacker on side .
It's got to be an intentional touch off the defender.Its early ! But can a attacker be off side if it comes of a defender last ? Sure I have seen players score when its come of a defender last making the attacker on side .
It's got to be an intentional touch off the defender.
It's funny how ifs and coulds always turn into will and shoulds when VARring United and Liverpool.It does, but an intentional touch doesn't always play someone onside again.
If a player is offside, he can be played on by an attempt to play the ball, but not if the attempt is just a block. Kane got one off Lovren a year or so ago, but was 20 yards out and an attempted clearance.
It's why a keeper saving a shot doesn't play someone onside. Maguire could be viewed as blocking, and if so, that would not play someone onside. Ifs and coulds!
It's funny how ifs and coulds always turn into will and shoulds when VARring United and Liverpool.
and when someone is a full toe offside, they'll say it's still too close, then a foot, then a leg. Football is an analogue sport being (mis)controlled by a digital system.I don't know what much else there is to say about VAR. Great technology destroyed by new legislation and implementation.
All the great goals and celebrations now obliterated from history. Ours v Spurs in Cl and more recently Rice for WHU v Sheff U away, Iheanacho v Norwich away, Maguire OG v Everton yesterday. In any sane world all those goals and many more are given.
Yet, we'll have a review at the end of the season, they will say toenails offside are now going to be deemed onside and there will be no accountability for the hundreds of incorrect decisions this season.