BlueHammer85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 35,846
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
VAR Discussion Thread - 2023/24 | PL clubs to vote on whether to scrap VAR (pg413)
- Thread starter MAG
- Start date
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 57,430
The second one was offside as the Chelsea player closest to the camera in the box bumped the defender, interfering with play.
The first is a poor decision.
BlueHammer85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 35,846
The second one was offside as the Chelsea player closest to the camera in the box bumped the defender, interfering with play.
The first is a poor decision.
Fair enough.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 57,430
Both show the advantage of having VAR though.Fair enough.
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 88,720
Apologies if previously posted but I do like hearing and seeing the process. I’m sure most fans would feel a lot less uneasy about “fixes” if we could hear the audio like this but live.
It does show that the Derby goal against us last season should 100% have been chalked off.
It does show that the Derby goal against us last season should 100% have been chalked off.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 57,430
Apologies if previously posted but I do like hearing and seeing the process. I’m sure most fans would feel a lot less uneasy about “fixes” if we could hear the audio like this but live.
It does show that the Derby goal against us last season should 100% have been chalked off.
You’d never hear it in the stadium. It might work on TV.
If it always worked like that, then far less would challenge VAR.
TinFoilHat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2023
- Messages
- 23,712
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Apologies if previously posted but I do like hearing and seeing the process. I’m sure most fans would feel a lot less uneasy about “fixes” if we could hear the audio like this but live.
It does show that the Derby goal against us last season should 100% have been chalked off.
This is all I ask for.
Compared to the Spurs farce that was a very measured and professional conversation.
Let us listen in and we'll understand it and accept the decisions. As you say it would remove the conspiracy theories from it.
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 88,720
Exactly. I don’t agree with 100% of the rugby refs decisions but being able to listen to their reasoning at least enables me to understand it.This is all I ask for.
Compared to the Spurs farce that was a very measured and professional conversation.
Let us listen in and we'll understand it and accept the decisions. As you say it would remove the conspiracy theories from it.
BlueHammer85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 35,846
Apologies if previously posted but I do like hearing and seeing the process. I’m sure most fans would feel a lot less uneasy about “fixes” if we could hear the audio like this but live.
It does show that the Derby goal against us last season should 100% have been chalked off.
Impressively done that
kaz7
Well-Known Member
Ha, scraping the barrel now