TinFoilHat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2023
- Messages
- 26,082
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Arsenal were allowed to score when the same thing happened in the build up.How did that linesman miss that handball for their disallowed goal.
Arsenal were allowed to score when the same thing happened in the build up.How did that linesman miss that handball for their disallowed goal.
It's got to due with VAR. Linos have been instructed to do nothing when they see anything.How did that linesman miss that handball for their disallowed goal.
Not the same thing at all. On the West Ham disallowed goal, he had the arm extended, it was inside the box, leading directly to the goal, and it hit lower on the arm near the wrist. He pretty much punched the ball in with his hand there. You can't compare that scenario to what happened in the Arsenal Everton match.Arsenal were allowed to score when the same thing happened in the build up.
If that goal was given and there was no VAR, it would indeed be a howler. But chances are they see that in real-time, with the arm extended, coming off a set piece corner, where the referee is in prime position to see that. Typically the chances of the referee missing a handball off a corner is minimal, compared to handballs following free kicks from farther out, or in the run of play, when the referee is sprinting down late to arrive to the incident, and having his view blocked by other players. When there's a corner, typically the referee positions himself to give himself a good angle to see any potential handballs without having his view blocked.That handball was a perfect example of why we need to keep VAR, it is the way that it gets used currently where the problem lies.
Can you imagine how easy it would have been for the officials to have given that goal today, and what could have happened then.
Hyperbole aside, City are voting to keep VAR.
Arsenal were allowed to score when the same thing happened in the build up.
I think this video shows the frustration with VAR is largely the inconsistency with application of the rules by the referees and VARs, and the failure of the league and PGMOL to acknowledge—and make changes to mitigate—the consistent errors, variation of outcomes, and/or flaws with the technology.It wasn’t the same thing, as Jesus wasn’t the goalscorer, so he would have needed to deliberately handle the ball for it to be an offence.
While there’s no intent needed for the West Ham goalscorer to commit an offence. Just evidence that it’s touched his hand/ arm.
You can see from that video he deliberately knocked the ball past the Everton player with his arm, Oliver is a twat. Thank goodness it did not have any effect on the outcome of the Premier League.I think this video shows the frustration with VAR is largely the inconsistency with application of the rules by the referees and VARs, and the failure of the league and PGMOL to acknowledge—and make changes to mitigate—the consistent errors, variation of outcomes, and/or flaws with the technology.
Gallagher gives his “I can understand why the two decisions were different” defence of two very similar handball incidents involving VAR leading to two very different outcomes.
Ref Watch: Should Kai Havertz's winner against Everton have stood?
The Ref Watch team have their say on Kai Havertzs winner against Everton and whether it should have counted following a possible handball from Gabriel Jesus in the build-up.www.skysports.com
Some fans would always be unhappy, I freely admit that, but I do believe the anti-VAR fervour would be much more isolate if fans could see them actually trying to substantively improve the system and processes, rather than roll out initiatives merely meant to gaslight fans and legitimise what already is.