You'd think he could but why he or the assistant VAR, Dan Cook, did not speak up when they realised the mistake, I don't know. Perhaps they still weren't paying attention and didn't realise until a few minutes later and they thought it was too late then? Dozy buggers.Can't he just tell the ref to stop the game and award the goal after he realised he didn't give it ?
I didn't see the match, just the still that was shown. What was the defender doing with his leg out backwards like that? Was he moving forwards? I suppose my question is how we know they chose the right frame for the still? Are we sure the linesman couldn't have judged the timing better from the sound of ball contact, difficult though that would be? A couple of frames could make all the difference. Why do we all assume now the frame they show us is the right one? Pretty sure I would trust the linesman's instincts more than some incompetent's ability to determine when a ball moves, tbh.The liner got it wrong. But it's difficult for the liner to judge in real time. He only gets one view once, he has to watch the ball and the movement of the attacker and the defenders all at the same time, whilst he and the players are moving. He doesn't know what is going to happen either, although he can anticipate it.
The UEFA SOAT is preferable.
I'm sure they did and that made it worse.Have we ever got an apology from these cunts , even the corruption at the swamp they didn't bother now everyone gets apology hahaha
Yes and I prefer the old days and if mistakes were made because of human error then so be it.
That was 2 fingers stuck up at us as tbe incompetent wanker failed to send Hwang off when he committed a definite second yellow offence. As some one pointed out it was almost identical to Jotas yellow.Darren England replaced with Craig Pawson.
Yeah that'll end well
There should be no going to the monitor to check a decision.Maybe. I don't the know figures in terms of how many decisions are correct pre and post VAR. I would expect VAR to improve accuracy, of course. I accept it will never be 100% correct for all decisions. But there still seems to be too many errors.
I was lead to believe it was 100% correct for offside, (frame tolerance aside). Now I'm not convinced.
Yes, it was wrong, human error and that was that. What is the excuses with VAR and by the way, when it first was used in the World Cup tournament, there were disagreements then. As I’ve said before, my arguments with it are two fold, the enjoyment it’s taken out of the game when someone has scored a goal and the fact that there are still so many errors and disagreements with it. I accept that those in charge will probably never go back to not using VAR.In the week without VAR, England womens lost to a wrong onside decision - the manager and fans were furious VAR was not in use.
Same for City fans calling in angry about not having VAR for Newcastle match in which Pep was furious at officials .
These were just from a couple rare matches without VAR.
I’m ok scrapping it and going back to how it was. Seriously I am. But let’s not pretend fans will be any happier without it, they’ll be so outraged watching a CLEAR offside goal stand or a complete no contact dive given against their club - especially nowadays in todays social media outraged world.
For me VAR errors like Diaz goal are simply unacceptable and it’s important that they improve to ensure it never happens again. Unfortunately it’s impossible to get every single decision ever correct in my opinion but they should always strive to do so - VAR gives us that chance, without VAR then it’s forever and on a larger scale more of a shambles in todays game.
Totally understand fans that reason the delay after goal takes away the fun for many. Personally I’m ok with it and accept I’m in the minority.
Wouldn't be surprised of they voted against the semi -automated VAR offered at the start of the season,given the usual favourable decisions they receive over the course of the season.Now that a decision has gone against the Mickey's watch out for some sort of rule change .
How about an apology to Pep for Pawson not refereeing the match as it should. He saw the foul on Walker, therefore he should have known it was worthy of a second yellow. That non decision to send the Wolves player off, who scored their winning goal, may have cost us the game.Webb will probably pick some none decision in the game between Forest and Brentford to prove why he should still be in a job on TV on Monday.
England checked his bank pre-match and saw that his usual LFC "bonus" had not been paid.Something fishy definitely went on.
I can live with that tbh. If VAR isn’t even eliminating clear factual mistakes, then the trade off (slowing game down, not being able to fully celebrate goals etc) doesn’t seem worth it frankly.
I believe the reason given was some nonsense about the tech evolving, and they didn't want to go to the expense of introducing a new system as they expected something better to be developed in the coming seasons.Is the system they use in the champions league the one that the premier league turned down,if so why and what were the reasons for it,from what I’ve seen of it,it seems 100% foolproof maybe that’s the reason they turned it down the ability to manipulate games would be taken away possibly..