it should have been offside. No argument.
Go play in the Megan and Harry thread you fucking wum.
it should have been offside. No argument.
‘’Lol’’ - how old are you ?
Morning angry man
Nope, no debate on this offside from me unfortunately for you.
It was offside. No argument.
Have a nice day
It would be fit for purpose if the folk who are using it did right .......... but when you’ve got a bunch of officials who make error after error on the football pitch then there bound to get it wrong when there sat in front of a tele .............. that yesterday was fooking embarrassing and sadly at some stage it’s gonna cost someone big time :( honestly City have enough games to pull it off and still win the title but I’m going on the back end of the season and if a certain club has a chance of winning the thing then I can guarantee a bent decision will go there way and that’s nailed on :(Thing is, VAR was sold to supporters of all teams as a tool to be used to apply fair and consistent decisions to ensure the correct outcomes are to be reached during games and by doing this, it was seen as a fair, unbiased way of assisting referees and linespersons to reach the correct decisions.
Nothing is 100% watertight and you will still get marginal decisions that can and will be given either way..
That's football, at least that's the football I remember..
Let's be clear here, there was absolutely nothing marginal about Rashford's offside yesterday.
Foden was flagged offside in the first half by the same linesman yesterday. The flag was immediately raised and the game stopped.
Rashford was so far offside, you have to ask why the flag didn't go up immediately, just like Foden..
Wolves were cheated last week at Anfield, not once but twice..
You constantly brush these calls away, stating VAR cannot be expected to get every call correct.
It's a disgrace what's happening with football at the moment, it's cheating in plain site with no accountability whatsoever..
The examples above blow the integrity of VAR and your support of it completely out of the water.
VAR is not fit for purpose.
It is becoming more and more a tool to give certain teams an advantage.
Luckily, I'm nothing like you and I can see exactly what's going on.
Yes.Is the answer therefore Rashford had an effect of the play even without touching the ball.
OFFSIDE by the laws of the game
Decisions are made very quickly at Old Trafford and Anfield,and all in favour of the home sides. Very strange.The VAR was brutal yesterday
Michael Oliver checking things in 3 seconds and saying no
Casemeiro on Cancelo is a foul anywhere else on the pitch
Didn’t seem to beWas there any VAR checks yesterday, any lines drawn, anything at all? Wouldnt be surprised if it wasnt working.
That decision yesterday just shows how hell bent the F.A and PIGMOL are complicit in pinning there colours to the mast on where they want the title to end up this season
With the bin dippers crashing and burning so early on and out of the race who else were they going to turn to give a helping Hand for the global brand of the premier league
Just mike the fuckers up so we can all here the decision
Prove to us it's not bent.
Full articleIt’s going well in Scotland:
“None of this is to suggest VAR has been a success story in Scotland. Far from it. Its arrival during a season – agreed to by clubs – was bizarre. A series of penalties were awarded from October to the World Cup break, largely for handball, which would never have been granted early in the season. Competitive fairness is therefore open to question. Those in high office screamed about the value of the paying fan when desperately trying to reopen turnstiles during Covid. And yet no widespread canvassing of supporters over this project was undertaken. The in-game experience for spectators has been consistently – and Postecoglou is correct here – muddled.”