BlueHammer85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 36,822
trying to find it, hardly mentioned anywhere
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
VAR thread 2022/23
- Thread starter Ric
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
trying to find it, hardly mentioned anywhere
blue by birth
Well-Known Member
There are a few pics on match day thread I thinktrying to find it, hardly mentioned anywhere
blue by birth
Well-Known Member
Post 983 on match threadtrying to find it, hardly mentioned anywhere
Stephen230
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2022
- Messages
- 7,558
- Team supported
- MCFC
That would depend on what the referee saw, would it not? If he thought there was no contact and there was, then that would be an error? If only there was some way to hear what they said to each other ......
If he thought there was contact but not enough to go down, then I would like to stamp in his toes with some studs as well.
Happy New Year to you as well, by the way. To everyone, in fact. Happy New Years all round.
Happy New Year to you aswell.
Howard Webb has indicated he’d like to go down the road of having some of the communication being made public. As he did in America. It would be interesting for sure. Not sure it would be quite the key to removing all controversy as some seem to think though.
On this specific incident. Not sure it’s hugely relevant from a VAR perspective if the referee thought there was minimal or no contact. He’s not going to be getting involved in borderline decisions like that either way. The referee’s decision is virtually always going to be final in those sort of challenges.
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
He didn't see a lot yesterday, and if we heard what was said between the ref and the VAR shed their 'manipulative' game would be up!That would depend on what the referee saw, would it not? If he thought there was no contact and there was, then that would be an error? If only there was some way to hear what they said to each other ......
If he thought there was contact but not enough to go down, then I would like to stamp in his toes with some studs as well.
Happy New Year to you as well, by the way. To everyone, in fact. Happy New Years all round.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,128
Happy New Year to you aswell.
Howard Webb has indicated he’d like to go down the road of having some of the communication being made public. As he did in America. It would be interesting for sure. Not sure it would be quite the key to removing all controversy as some seem to think though.
On this specific incident. Not sure it’s hugely relevant from a VAR perspective if the referee thought there was minimal or no contact. He’s not going to be getting involved in borderline decisions like that either way. The referee’s decision is virtually always going to be final in those sort of challenges.
I suppose that's where we differ. If VAR is going to determine whether something is borderline or not, then he is refereeing, not VARing. Seems to me he should look at it, ask the referee what he saw, and if he sees something the referee didn't see, then he should ask the ref to review it because that would be a clear error. If it was obvious as well should be a decision for the referee to make.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,128
Post-match thread for our BH83 friend, but yes thanks :)Post 983 on match thread
Last edited:
Stephen230
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2022
- Messages
- 7,558
- Team supported
- MCFC
I suppose that's where we differ. If VAR is going to determine whether something is borderline or not, then he is refereeing, not VARing. Seems to me he should look at it, ask the referee what he saw, and if he sees something the referee didn't see, then he should ask the ref to review it because that would be a clear error. If it was obvious as well should be a decision for the referee to make.
It’s not really where WE differ. Maybe more where your opinion differs to the actual guidelines and protocol. There is, rightly or wrongly, no scope currently for the referee to say to the VAR something along the lines of…. I just haven’t seen that incident at all, can you advise? He has to make a decision. And then it down to the VAR, under their guidelines to decide if the incident is reviewable.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,128
It’s not really where WE differ. Maybe more where your opinion differs to the actual guidelines and protocol. There is, rightly or wrongly, no scope currently for the referee to say to the VAR something along the lines of…. I just haven’t seen that incident at all, can you advise? He has to make a decision. And then it down to the VAR, under their guidelines to decide if the incident is reviewable.
You are right. IMO it's sporadically practically an impractical protocol.
stonerblue
Well-Known Member
Are you asking Hammer to 'go to VAR' ?The fucker stood on Mahrez foot..have a fucking look before you say it couldn't have been that obvious.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.