The Future’s Blue!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 10,792
- Team supported
- City
The ref...
Whatever was happening, a goal for Wolves was not not going to be allowed to stand.
The ref...
So, are you saying that the game is being manipulated for commercial benefit?The huge conflict of interest with VAR is that the broadcasters supply the pictures and dictate the angles and shots shown. The same broadcasters who are beholden to the sponsors and who all make more money out of showing Utd and Liverpool than any other clubs. It would be commercial self harm for either of those clubs to be permitted to lose in the third round, so the true VAR picture is simply withheld and on we go with Liverpool winning the replay and everybody happy. It is the same reason why it was a nailed on certainty that United were getting Charlton in the League Cup draw.
Disagree.So let's have a look at the three seasons pre- and post-VAR.
Pre: 8, 3 and 7 penalties
Post: 5, 6 and 8 penalties
Actually one more post-VAR than pre-.
You are using this year to date, which as far as I can tell is 0 penalties, to try to justify a point when it is just an outlier due to other factors, probably due to the fact they are crap this year.
You don't need to do it. I think most reasonable people would agree that the availability of VAR has led to a reduction in play-acting and trying to con the ref, as we saw very clearly, I think, at the world cup.
But this whole discussion started because the feeling was that, if someone trod on Salah's foot when he was running in the box at Anfield, he would get a penalty. Let's see if that happens and, if it does, what the result is.
Can't wait for dermott Gallagher tomorrow
See what spin he can put on things to prove the ref was correct
Just tried to record that. Went to TV guide for SSN, it is normallly listed as 11.30 am Ref Watch programme. It appears not to be on.