I'm at the match (unlike the spammer) ot looked a clear handball so why did it take so long to give it?
The argument that iit hadn't gone out of play is ludicrous. Var should be able to tell the useless fuck and it should ne awarded
Have to disagree with you on that one. Ok, I watched in on the box, but couldn't hear a cry of handball from the crowd and not a single City player appealed for a penalty.looked a clear handball so why did it take so long to give it?
Fortunately it's not cricket.Have to disagree with you on that one. Ok, I watched in on the box, but couldn't hear a cry of handball from the crowd and not a single City player appealed for a penalty.
The goal would have stood and no penSo if Alvarez had gone onto score when the ball was still in play, would the penalty had also been given afterwards?
Guarantee if City don’t put the game away early tomorrow or we struggle, Var/officials will find a way to make sure we go out.
Put it to the fans. Then we’ll see which argument wins. What’s your thoughts? Fans will vote to have / keep VAR or fans say “No”, bin it.I’ll never accept this argument - more matches were ruined before VAR than they are now - fair enough if you recall it differently
Put it to the fans. Then we’ll see which argument wins. What’s your thoughts? Fans will vote to have / keep VAR or fans say “No”, bin it.
Not sure that is correct. Every training course I have been on we used to get told never to play advantage on a penalty or red card offence. I have seen a game recently in Germany (I think) where a team scored & it was chalked off & a penalty awarded. Penalty was subsequently missed.The referee was asked to check it. If we had scored, then advantage would have applied and we would have a goal instead of the penalty.
You do a lot of posting on this thread - how many games do you go to? You played 38 league games and 18 cup games last season so, 56 in total. So, how many home, how many away did you do? I’m guessing... none.Always next time aye
Rules have not changed. Salah goal should have been allowed.Get what you're saying about the cross being right at Salah, that feels offside to me, at any rate.
City's was a pass forward from a city player, it was then controlled by Ming's and immediately robbed. However, I've just remembered, they subsequently changed the rules to stop this or something. I can't really fathom why Salah's counted.