SebastianBlue
President, International Julian Alvarez Fan Club
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 57,736
The fact that Casimero should 100% have walked for that challenge aside, in what universe is that a foul by Akanji?
I'm not sure who is more guilty of cheating here; the Rag or the Ref?
David Coote - "Notts County Fan"Has to be the ref.
The rag was doing exactly what he is used to doing, ie fouling the opposing player.
The ref can only see a foul by Casimero as he clearly stamps on Akanj's foot , and yet proceeds to award a free kick to the rags.
How in god's name, can that be a free kick to the rags ?
Corruption, or high level bias and /or incompetence ??
David **** - "Notts Cunty Fan"
David Coote - "Notts County Fan"
What is to stop attacking players purposely smashing the ball at defenders in the hope it hits their hand/arm?Personally I wish with handball they would just say 'hits your hand (below the sleeve) - hand ball every time no matter how it happened. Would it be ludicrous? Yes, to a degree, and would result in a number of unfair pens. But... it would stop people getting away with anything subjective and take away the power the refs have now.
Selfishly it would help us as we are in the opposition box more - but this is more about stopping the refs from getting away with 'subjective calls' on whether the arm was in an 'unnatural position'
I'd go the opposite way - almost all handballs aren't worth a penalty, so unless it's a really obvious one, no penalty.Personally I wish with handball they would just say 'hits your hand (below the sleeve) - hand ball every time no matter how it happened. Would it be ludicrous? Yes, to a degree, and would result in a number of unfair pens. But... it would stop people getting away with anything subjective and take away the power the refs have now.
Selfishly it would help us as we are in the opposition box more - but this is more about stopping the refs from getting away with 'subjective calls' on whether the arm was in an 'unnatural position'
As another post has alluded I'm struggling to think of when the two clubs that don't have fully implemented VAR in the ground because (insert spurious reason here) have been fucked over by it.To be honest, there were enough examples in the match to demonstrate that VAR and it's operation by PiGMOL is absolutely not fit for for purpose.
The fact that the incidents were called out by pundits on the BBC ( of all platforms ) imo indicates that people who have played professional football realise what a sham the referees and VAR officials are regularly producing with such disgraceful decisions clearly bringing into question the integrity of the officials.
And it would appear to be no coincidence that united and liverpool often are the beneficiaries of these " questionable decisions ".
How far away was the linesman from this ?Has to be the ref.
The rag was doing exactly what he is used to doing, ie fouling the opposing player.
The ref can only see a foul by Casimero as he clearly stamps on Akanj's foot , and yet proceeds to award a free kick to the rags.
How in god's name, can that be a free kick to the rags ?
Corruption, or high level bias and /or incompetence ??