VAR thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
We still haven't got to the bottom of the VAR 'Match commander' question. The PL say there isn't one, but SOMEONE decides who sees what.
There definitely is a match commander and this was stated at the outset of VAR. I think the original one was Neil Swarbrick who was peddled out to great fanfare from PGMOL.
 
There definitely is a match commander and this was stated at the outset of VAR. I think the original one was Neil Swarbrick who was peddled out to great fanfare from PGMOL.
 
This has obviously been bedunked as the PL have said so.

When Swarbrick retired as a ref, he was taken on as the VAR Implementation Officer and during an interview I remember him saying that he, or another, would be in Shockley Park to oversee the VAR.
 
This has obviously been bedunked as the PL have said so.

When Swarbrick retired as a ref, he was taken on as the VAR Implementation Officer and during an interview I remember him saying that he, or another, would be in Shockley Park to oversee the VAR.
Debunked because the PL 'said so'...

Halsey has also made accusations that he'd been asked to alter his match report to say he hadn't seen an incident so that a retrospective Red card could be issued.

Somebody is lying.
 
Debunked because the PL 'said so'...

Halsey has also made accusations that he'd been asked to alter his match report to say he hadn't seen an incident so that a retrospective Red card could be issued.

Somebody is lying.
I’d trust what Halsey has said, especially as the accusations he came out with were never put to the lawyers by PGMOL/PL.

They may not directly refer to the likes of Swarbrick as the match commander, but there’s definitely somebody there pulling the strings
 
If I had the time I'd put in a FOI request for the answers to those questions. I would also ask to see calibration certificates and fault logs, especially relating to the Dipper's game where VAR didn't seem to be working when they appeared to guess on the TAA handball and Salah offside decision.
And as long as there is no transparency there will be no trust.
 
Because you haven’t bothered trying to find out the answers?

The answer to everything you ask is freely available and easily found.
I beg to differ, one site, PremierLeague.com is so confusing I gave up. It seems to suggest 5 cameras 2 of which are on the 18 yard lines are used for offsides.
Another site said there were 33! These include slow motion and super slow motion cameras.
Espn state that var can only use the cameras supplied by the broadcaster.
So thank you for your rather smug, condescending answer but it didn't help.
 
So, offside is still subjective?

Got it.
Seems so, there have been goals ruled offside for the tiniest margins inc Toneys goal for Brentford at Fulham last weekend so no surprise this new rule went in the Rags favour where it’s been ignored in other games. Only surprise is how quiet the Dippers and Media have been over it. If we scored that it would still be headline news
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.