mrtwiceaseason said:
JoeMercer'sWay said:
simple for me, 2 challenges each team, can be used for penalty appeals, mistaken identity, red card decisions, either if play has been stopped, or gone out of play, if the ball is in play and they want to challenge, the team appealing has to kick the ball out of play.
The 4th Official gets the review, he's given 60 seconds to look at the angles to decide, and if he can't decide within 60 seconds that the referee's decision can be clearly overturned, then the decision remains on-field.
So how does that work say contentious decision in the first 10 min ,reviewed rejected 2 good shouts for pens ,sendings off etc in same half .
Once you challenge has been used up you would be no better off.
Correct (as I highlighted with my own example earlier in the thread)
IMO there is absolutely no way on Earth that any system where managers are involved in the process will ever be implemented. It's not American football, the flow and in-game management/refereeing of our game is so far removed from theirs that comparisons between the two are IMO completely pointless. All this flag throwing nonsense has no place in proper football, it's just too arbitrary/random. We need a "set in stone" set of guidelines to follow for when the technology is used, every time a certain event occurs on the field of play.
As Mr. 'eader said, much like the goal line technology is now used,
video technology needs to be introduced slowly, for specific decision making purposes (ie ALL GOALS - reviewed by a screen watching adjudicator who has the final say on whether or not any infringements have taken place)
When this usage has been proved to be workable the use of the technology can be increased to include all red cards, and again, after a certain period of successful usage, it can be used to help other decision making processes. Easy-Peasy! Or is it?