The Future’s Blue!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 Dec 2019
- Messages
- 11,021
- Team supported
- City
Foden was a shining light who inspired others to perform.
You'll never get a job in the UK media.Foden was a shining light who inspired others to perform.
Ward should have saved both of his goalsBBC new “he was the star of the show with two goals here”……….bit overhyped
If a chance comes to Foden he usually takes it. If waistcoat reverts to Sterling that would not be the case.Foden was a shining light who inspired others to perform.
And he won’t get the plaudits whilst there’s a Rag around.You'll never get a job in the UK media.
Said a while back, when you have 2 extreme talents to call upon, why would you play the normal.If a chance comes to Foden he usually takes it. If waistcoat reverts to Sterling that would not be the case.
City knew what they were doing when they let him go to Chelsea.
Watching the analysis on the Beeb, gutted Phil didn't play tonight
I thought that might be the case so as soon as the match finished I turned it off. it was always going to be a Rashford lovein.
Rashford got lucky with his second goal because the best option was to pass. Rashford is a very limited player, not a great crosser, in the first half he had a great chance to pass between the keeper and Foden, instead he pulled it back to no one !.
He reminds of a kid who gets lucky with his bad decisions, but we notice the work that others in the team do. These others are better players, any good coach can see this.
Foden is a much superior player than Rashford, Foden see's things that Rashford couldnt even on a replay.
The two commentators were an embarrassment with they love for Rashford. He was the same with Stones and Maguire pundits would say Maguire made Stones look good. We could all see it was the other way round.
Phil was clearly better than Rashford last night but he will be over looked for the rag
This is way I have trouble supporting England.