Well done, scientific proof for the ocularly challenged.Chippy boy, I disagree. I was convinced the ball was out but did an experiment tonight (yes that's sad) which made me very doubtful. I placed a ball so that from an overhead view a tiny bit of the ball was not accross a line i.e. in play under the rules. I was amazed that from every angle it looked out and from most, well out. It was only the directly overhead angle that you could see it was in.
Well done, scientific proof for the ocularly challenged.
For the umpteenth time, you do NOT need to be overhead to get the definitive view. ANY view directly along the line gives you the same view as to whether the ball is over or not. How high up you view from makes NO difference to what you see.
We have a clear and definitive view along the line and the ball is definitively out, end of debate. Their is no room for argument here - no "balance of probability" etc. As a statement of incontrovertible fact, the ball went out.
Please please please send this to Sky!!!!!Definitive proof;
the ball did not go over the line!
The most important fact is that it was 'in' for the officials, and for ever it will say we won 3-1, 4-3 on aggregate.It was in for me.