We dont look like a team under Hughes

Luke_mcfc said:
I'm sorry for joining this thread... but some of the opinions on here are shocking! You need to analyse the game against Bolton properly to get an understanding of whether we were poor or not.

Bolton Wanderers Team Statistics Manchester City
3 Goals 3
2 1st Half Goals 2
3 Shots on Target 6
6 Shots off Target 9
4 Blocked Shots 1
5 Corners 9
13 Fouls 11
2 Offsides 2
3 Yellow Cards 1
0 Red Cards 1
57.7 Passing Success 75.6
28 Tackles 12
60.7 Tackles Success 83.3
34.7 Possession 65.3
43.4 Territorial Advantage 56.6

Please read the above and explain to me how we have not dominated the game? Bolton had three shots on target and scored 3. That is a freak of a statistic. Any other day that wouldn't have happened. In every statistic (apart from goals scored, obviously) we have dominated the game.

Given the above please come back to me with some proper, thought out points to prove otherwise. At the minute it just seems people are looking for any excuse to get rid of Mark Hughes?? I'm looking for proper constructive points. Not just 'Bowen is a wanker' or 'Hughes is shit'. Prove that he is shit...


You're on the wrong forum if you want constructive debate mate, especially when 1 can Van Damme's like Big Mals Cigar have had a pint and come out with 'i'm a better fan than you' bollocks.
 
Big Mals Cigar said:
CLEAVERS ha ha i sucked you in huck line and sinker and now i know what i said got to you.A mean that is a bit of a weapon i have got
and it has got under your skin.The best thing you could have done is to not reply to my posts .School boy error you daft sod
well it certainly isn't command of the English language
 
Pigeonho said:
Big Mals Cigar said:
CLEAVERS a certain someone said on here last night to me that you dont even go to the games
and that the only ones you go to are the carling cup.And the vibe today around manchester
is shit because mark hughes failed to beat a very poor team with over 100million pounds worth
of talent and you still think he is a good manager.It is a good job you dont go to the games pal
jesus christ

Sat on my hands trying not to respond to you, but your posts are bog-standard, at best. A week before yesterdays result we beat Chelsea, a VERY good team. Has it ever crossed your obvious limited intelligenced mind that Bolton raised their game yesterday, just like we did when we faced a team better than us? (Chelsea). Look at the league table. ONE defeat. Name me ONE more team who only has ONE defeat. Go on, do it......

YIPPEE we have only had ONE defeat, but 8 draws in last 9 games. If we have lost half but WON the other half of them eight. We'd have 4 more points.
 
Big Mal... Is that it? Is that the argument? 'Our defence was shocking'?? Well thats it then, I'm a Hughes outer now... You're really good at convincing people that you're right...
 
Luke_mcfc said:
I'm sorry for joining this thread... but some of the opinions on here are shocking! You need to analyse the game against Bolton properly to get an understanding of whether we were poor or not.

Bolton Wanderers Team Statistics Manchester City
3 Goals 3
2 1st Half Goals 2
3 Shots on Target 6
6 Shots off Target 9
4 Blocked Shots 1
5 Corners 9
13 Fouls 11
2 Offsides 2
3 Yellow Cards 1
0 Red Cards 1
57.7 Passing Success 75.6
28 Tackles 12
60.7 Tackles Success 83.3
34.7 Possession 65.3
43.4 Territorial Advantage 56.6

Please read the above and explain to me how we have not dominated the game? Bolton had three shots on target and scored 3. That is a freak of a statistic. Any other day that wouldn't have happened. In every statistic (apart from goals scored, obviously) we have dominated the game.

Given the above please come back to me with some proper, thought out points to prove otherwise. At the minute it just seems people are looking for any excuse to get rid of Mark Hughes?? I'm looking for proper constructive points. Not just 'Bowen is a wanker' or 'Hughes is shit'. Prove that he is shit...

we didn't dominate that game, sorry. they lead three teams. they had several breaks where they should have scored but somehow failed to get a shot away... both teams looked capable of scoring at any point. they got lucky, but they are still one of the three poorest teams in the premiership, and they scored three times against us. i just can't see anything positive about the game except for our fighting spirit.
 
Big Mals Cigar said:
LUKE-MCFC am sorry mate but i was at the game and are defence of the ball is shocking.

Its that shocking we've only lost once all season. Sack them, sack them all, we should have lost NONE and won them ALL with the money we spent, surely?

It wouldn't surprise me if you have never been to a game ever. Oh and for the record I started going in 1988, probably whilst you were still a sperm swimming around in your dads bollocks.
 
can anyone honestly, hand on heart, say, that when we went behind in bygone years we were confident of a come back?
look at us against villa,rags,dippers and bolton yesterday. This is the 1st time in 20 odd years i've not panicked when behind.FFS we were battering them with ten men yesterday! i am not at all happy with the run of draws, but....if this is our bad patch, then give me it, look at liverpool. now they look fucked!
 
bizzbo said:
Luke_mcfc said:
I'm sorry for joining this thread... but some of the opinions on here are shocking! You need to analyse the game against Bolton properly to get an understanding of whether we were poor or not.

Bolton Wanderers Team Statistics Manchester City
3 Goals 3
2 1st Half Goals 2
3 Shots on Target 6
6 Shots off Target 9
4 Blocked Shots 1
5 Corners 9
13 Fouls 11
2 Offsides 2
3 Yellow Cards 1
0 Red Cards 1
57.7 Passing Success 75.6
28 Tackles 12
60.7 Tackles Success 83.3
34.7 Possession 65.3
43.4 Territorial Advantage 56.6

Please read the above and explain to me how we have not dominated the game? Bolton had three shots on target and scored 3. That is a freak of a statistic. Any other day that wouldn't have happened. In every statistic (apart from goals scored, obviously) we have dominated the game.

Given the above please come back to me with some proper, thought out points to prove otherwise. At the minute it just seems people are looking for any excuse to get rid of Mark Hughes?? I'm looking for proper constructive points. Not just 'Bowen is a wanker' or 'Hughes is shit'. Prove that he is shit...

we didn't dominate that game, sorry. they lead three teams. they had several breaks where they should have scored but somehow failed to get a shot away... both teams looked capable of scoring at any point. they got lucky, but they are still one of the three poorest teams in the premiership, and they scored three times against us. i just can't see anything positive about the game except for our fighting spirit.

The performance of Carlos Tevez was a massive positive.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.